2009 Winter Project Week:LesionAlgorithms - Revision history

Mscully: /* Key Investigators */

2009-01-09T16:35:05Z

Key Investigators

2009-01-05T18:51:51Z

Key Investigators

2009-01-05T18:50:10Z

Key Investigators

2009-01-05T18:47:58Z

Key Investigators

2008-12-11T21:31:07Z

Key Investigators

@@ Line 18: / Line 18: @@
 There are also other methods within the NA-MIC kit and and external approach that is being developed to be used within Slicer (WMLS).<br>
 Currently for our end to end tutorial, we have implemented a novel algorithm because the generalizability of our previous method to the clinical sample was poor.<br>
+We need to make a final selection on choice of algorithm and any resulting optimization strategy to be used for final analysis and a timely manuscript.
 </div>
@@ Line 26: / Line 26: @@
 <h1>Approach, Plan</h1>
 Review comparisons of NA-MIC kit tools EM-Segment, Prastawa Method, Magnotta Method, a new method a UPenn, etc<br>
-what is the best approach to use for the roadmap project?<br>
+What is the best approach to use for the roadmap project?<br>
 What if anything can be leveraged or combined into a universal method?<br>
 This work should lead towards planned MICCAI (march 8 due date) or other venue paper on white matter lesion also plan on immediately after full application/analysis of a clinical lupus sample (n=62).<br>

@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
 ===Key Investigators===
-Marcel, Vince, Ross, Jeremy
+Mark, Marcel, Vince, Ross, Jeremy
 <div style="margin: 20px;">
@@ Line 15: / Line 15: @@
 <h1>Objective</h1>
-We have tested several algorithms and approaches for classifying white matter lesions.
+We have tested several algorithms and approaches for classifying white matter lesions.<br>
-There are also other methods within the NA-MIC kit and approaches that are being developed to be used within Slicer.
+There are also other methods within the NA-MIC kit and and external approach that is being developed to be used within Slicer (WMLS).<br>
-Currently for our end to end tutorial, we have implemented a novel algorithm.
+Currently for our end to end tutorial, we have implemented a novel algorithm because the generalizability of our previous method to the clinical sample was poor.<br>

@@ Line 16: / Line 16: @@
 <h1>Objective</h1>
 We have tested several algorithms and approaches for classifying white matter lesions.
-At the moment, we have implemented vince magnotta's algorithm into the roadmap project/tutorial.
+There are also other methods within the NA-MIC kit and approaches that are being developed to be used within Slicer.
@@ Line 24: / Line 25: @@
 <h1>Approach, Plan</h1>
-Review comparisons of NA-MIC kit tools EM-Segment, Prastawa Method, Magnotta Method, etc
+Review comparisons of NA-MIC kit tools EM-Segment, Prastawa Method, Magnotta Method, a new method a UPenn, etc<br>
-discuss looking at k-nearest neighbor (the approach that won the MICCAI brain lesion challenge)
+what is the best approach to use for the roadmap project?<br>
-what is the best approach to use for the roadmap project?
+What if anything can be leveraged or combined into a universal method?<br>
 </div>
@@ Line 32: / Line 34: @@
 <h1>Progress</h1>
 </div>

@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
 ===Key Investigators===
+Marcel, Vince, Ross, Jeremy
 <div style="margin: 20px;">
@@ Line 15: / Line 15: @@
 <h1>Objective</h1>
@@ Line 22: / Line 24: @@
 <h1>Approach, Plan</h1>
+Review comparisons of NA-MIC kit tools EM-Segment, Prastawa Method, Magnotta Method, etc
 </div>
@@ Line 28: / Line 32: @@
 <h1>Progress</h1>
+this work should lead towards planned MICCAI or other venue paper on white matter lesion also plan on full analysis of a clinical lupus sample
 </div>

@@ Line 35: / Line 35: @@
 <h1>Progress</h1>
 </div>
 <br style="clear: both;" />