2011 Winter Project Week:RegistrationAnisotropy - Revision history

Meier: /* Key Investigators */

2011-01-14T17:29:06Z

Key Investigators

2011-01-14T17:26:46Z

2011-01-14T17:14:06Z

Key Investigators

2011-01-13T23:21:44Z

2011-01-13T23:20:35Z

Key Investigators

2011-01-13T23:19:19Z

2011-01-13T23:18:42Z

2011-01-13T23:18:15Z

2011-01-13T23:16:00Z

Key Investigators

2010-12-13T01:18:56Z

Key Investigators

@@ Line 12: / Line 12: @@
 ==Key Investigators==
-* BWH: Dominik Meier,  Andriy Fedorov
+* BWH: Dominik Meier,  Andriy Fedorov, William Wells
 <div style="margin: 20px;">

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 Image:RegEval_JHBlur_RotX_AGif.gif|Fig.2: for comparison: example joint histogram blurring effects from rotation around x (LR) axis 1-15 degrees
 Image:RegEval_JHBlur_RotZ_AGif.gif|Fig.3: for comparison: example joint histogram blurring effects from rotation around z (IS) axis 1-15 degrees
 </gallery>

@@ Line 38: / Line 38: @@
 *we identified '''prostate MRI''' as a promising dataset for testing. Since hi-res isotropic data is never avail., we will move from the current anisotropy (x7) toward isotropic. Also we have 2 orientations (coronal vs. sagittal) and can compare the effects of having the anisotropy run in a different direction.
 *progress on exposing the '''ITK joint histogram''' functions and MI metric for quantifying the above shown effects.
 </div>
 </div>

@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
-=The 3DSlicer Registration Case Library Project=
+= Voxel Anisotropy in Registration =
 ==Key Investigators==
@@ Line 44: / Line 44: @@
 == Progress ==
-  project links go here
+ *see above
 </div>

@@ Line 36: / Line 36: @@
 <h3>Progress</h3>
 *see images above
-*we identified prostate MRI as a promising dataset for testing. Since hi-res isotropic data is never avail., we will move from the current anisotropy (x7) toward isotropic. Also we have 2 orientations (coronal vs. sagittal) and can compare the effects of having the anisotropy run in a different direction.
+*we identified '''prostate MRI''' as a promising dataset for testing. Since hi-res isotropic data is never avail., we will move from the current anisotropy (x7) toward isotropic. Also we have 2 orientations (coronal vs. sagittal) and can compare the effects of having the anisotropy run in a different direction.
-*progress on exposing the ITK joint histogram functions and MI metric for quantifying the above shown effects.
+*progress on exposing the '''ITK joint histogram''' functions and MI metric for quantifying the above shown effects.
 </div>
 </div>

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 __NOTOC__
-<gallery widths="400px" perrow="3">
+<gallery widths="400px" perrow="2">
-Image:RegEval_JointHist_AGif.gif|Fig.4: Example joint histogram blurring effects from anisotropic voxel size : 1x to 20x anisotropy
+Image:RegEval_JointHist_AGif.gif|Fig.1: Example joint histogram blurring effects from anisotropic voxel size : 1x to 20x anisotropy
-Image:RegEval_JHBlur_RotX_AGif.gif|Fig.5: for comparison: example joint histogram blurring effects from rotation around x (LR) axis 1-15 degrees
+Image:RegEval_JHBlur_RotX_AGif.gif|Fig.2: for comparison: example joint histogram blurring effects from rotation around x (LR) axis 1-15 degrees
-Image:RegEval_JHBlur_RotZ_AGif.gif|Fig.7: for comparison: example joint histogram blurring effects from rotation around z (IS) axis 1-15 degrees
+Image:RegEval_JHBlur_RotZ_AGif.gif|Fig.3: for comparison: example joint histogram blurring effects from rotation around z (IS) axis 1-15 degrees
 </gallery>

@@ Line 19: / Line 19: @@
 For this work we seek insight into the effects of voxel anisotropy and image inhomogeneity on registration accuracy and robustness.
 </div>
@@ Line 35: / Line 37: @@
 <h3>Progress</h3>
-*see below: [[2011_Winter_Project_Week:RegistrationAnisotropy#Progress]]
+*see images above
 </div>
 </div>