2013 Winter Project Week Gyne Brachy - Revision history

Grundlett: Text replacement - "http://www.slicer.org/slicerWiki/index.php/" to "https://www.slicer.org/wiki/"

2017-07-10T18:07:11Z

Text replacement - "http://www.slicer.org/slicerWiki/index.php/" to "https://www.slicer.org/wiki/"

Mehrtash: /* Project Description */

2013-01-11T08:29:11Z

Project Description

Mehrtash at 08:25, 11 January 2013

2013-01-11T08:25:05Z

Mehrtash at 08:24, 11 January 2013

2013-01-11T08:24:17Z

Mehrtash at 08:14, 11 January 2013

2013-01-11T08:14:07Z

Mehrtash at 08:12, 11 January 2013

2013-01-11T08:12:46Z

Mehrtash: /* Project Description */

2013-01-11T08:08:54Z

Project Description

Mehrtash: /* Key Investigators */

2013-01-07T23:02:38Z

Key Investigators

Mehrtash: /* Key Investigators */

2013-01-07T21:16:21Z

Key Investigators

Tkapur: /* Key Investigators */

2013-01-07T17:48:51Z

Key Investigators

@@ Line 17: / Line 17: @@
 <div style="width: 27%; float: left; padding-right: 3%;">
 <h3>Objective</h3>
-* The [http://www.slicer.org/slicerWiki/index.php/Documentation/Nightly/Extensions/iGyne iGyne module] is a user friendly Slicer module which is designed to assist gynecologic radiation oncologists in the process of applicator placement and brachytherapy needle insertion. Currently the module can perform applicator registration and needle segmentation successfully.
+* The [https://www.slicer.org/wiki/Documentation/Nightly/Extensions/iGyne iGyne module] is a user friendly Slicer module which is designed to assist gynecologic radiation oncologists in the process of applicator placement and brachytherapy needle insertion. Currently the module can perform applicator registration and needle segmentation successfully.
 * The objective of this project is to develop a method to validate and measure the accuracy of the needle segmentation results.
 </div>

@@ Line 29: / Line 29: @@
 <div style="width: 27%; float: left; padding-right: 3%;">
 <h3>Progress</h3>
-* To compare the segmented needles from MRI and CT, we tried different landmarks to for registration and we conclude that the best rigid anatomical landmark for this purpose is the hip bone.
+* To compare the segmented needles from MRI and CT, we tried different landmarks for registration and finally we conclude that the best rigid anatomical landmark for our purpose is the hip bone.
-* We found out that the needles displaced noticeably and their shapes has been changed by the patients position change from partial lithotomy position (the MRI data) to supine position (the CT data). This implies that in order to be able to use the CT data for validation iGyne  needle segmentation tool, we need to modify our workflow and add a supine position MRI to our IGT Gyne workflow.
+* We found out that the needles displaced noticeably and their shapes has been changed by the patients position switch from partial lithotomy position (the MRI data) to supine position (the CT data). This implies that in order to use the CT data for validating the iGyne  needle segmentation tool, we need to modify our workflow and add a supine position MRI to our IGT gynecological brachytherapy workflow.
 * Our findings about the needle position and shape changes demands a further investigation to understand and model those changes and their possible effect on the treatment results.
 * For the purpose of needle segmentation results validation we will add 3D point correspondence and similarity measures to iGyne module soon.
 </div>
 </div>

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 Image:needles.jpg| Segmented Brachytherapy Needles in iGyne.
 Image:01.png| MRI to CT registration.
-Image:011.png| Segmented brachytherapy Needles in MRI with patient lithotomy position (green ones) versus segmented needles from CT Scnas in supine position (red ones).
+Image:011.png| Segmented brachytherapy Needles in MRI with patient lithotomy position (green) versus segmented needles from CT Scnas in supine position (red).
 </gallery>

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 Image:needles.jpg| Segmented Brachytherapy Needles in iGyne.
 Image:01.png| MRI to CT registration.
-Image:02.png| Segmented Brachytherapy Needles in iGyne.
+Image:011.png| Segmented brachytherapy Needles in MRI with patient lithotomy position (green ones) versus segmented needles from CT Scnas in supine position (red ones).
 </gallery>

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 Image:PW-SLC2013.png|[[2013_Winter_Project_Week#Projects|Projects List]]
 Image:needles.jpg| Segmented Brachytherapy Needles in iGyne.
-Image:01.jpg| Segmented Brachytherapy Needles in iGyne.
+Image:01.png| MRI to CT registration.
-Image:02.jpg| Segmented Brachytherapy Needles in iGyne.
+Image:02.png| Segmented Brachytherapy Needles in iGyne.
-Image:03.jpg| Segmented Brachytherapy Needles in iGyne.
+Image:03.png| Segmented Brachytherapy Needles in iGyne.
-Image:04.jpg| Segmented Brachytherapy Needles in iGyne.
+Image:04.png| Segmented Brachytherapy Needles in iGyne.
 </gallery>

@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
 ==Key Investigators==
-* Alireza Mehrtash, Tina Kapur, Guillaume Pernelle, Jan Egger, Neha Agrawal, Damato Antonio, BWH
+* Alireza Mehrtash, Tina Kapur, Guillaume Pernelle, Jan Egger, Neha Agrawal, Antonio Damato, BWH
 * Csaba Pinter, Queen's