2014 Winter Project Week:XNATSlicerLink - Revision history

Erwin.vast: /* Project Description */

2014-01-10T16:23:13Z

Project Description

2014-01-10T14:57:19Z

Key Investigators

2014-01-10T14:56:04Z

Project Description

2014-01-10T14:55:45Z

Project Description

2014-01-10T04:36:03Z

Project Description

2014-01-10T04:34:58Z

Project Description

2014-01-10T04:34:46Z

Project Description

2014-01-10T04:31:37Z

Project Description

2014-01-10T04:31:16Z

Project Description

2014-01-10T04:30:52Z

Project Description

@@ Line 30: / Line 30: @@
 * Approach 1: Store annotation files only.
 * Approach 2: Store mrb file without image included (but next to original image data). Advantages: 1) more generic as is can include other meta-data, 2) all in one file, 3) prevents duplicate image data.
-* Almost implemented approach 2) but encountered some small problems which have to be discussed with the XNATSlicer creator.
+* Almost implemented approach 2) but encountered some small problems which have to be discussed with the XNATSlicer developer.
 </div>
 </div>

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 ==Key Investigators==
-* Erwin Vast (ErasmusMC, The Netherlands)
+* Erwin Vast, ErasmusMC, The Netherlands
 * Nicole Aucoin, BWH
 * Andrey Fedorov, BWH

@@ Line 30: / Line 30: @@
 * Approach 1: Store annotation files only.
 * Approach 2: Store mrb file without image included (but next to original image data). Advantages: 1) more generic as is can include other meta-data, 2) all in one file, 3) prevents duplicate image data.
-* Almost implemented approach 2) but encountered some small problems which have to be discussed with the creator.
+* Almost implemented approach 2) but encountered some small problems which have to be discussed with the XNATSlicer creator.
 </div>
 </div>

@@ Line 30: / Line 30: @@
 * Approach 1: Store annotation files only.
 * Approach 2: Store mrb file without image included (but next to original image data). Advantages: 1) more generic as is can include other meta-data, 2) all in one file, 3) prevents duplicate image data.
-* Started implementing approach 2) but encountered some problems which have to be discussed with Sunil.
+* Almost implemented approach 2) but encountered some small problems which have to be discussed with the creator.
 </div>
 </div>

@@ Line 29: / Line 29: @@
 <h3>Progress</h3>
 * Approach 1: Store annotation files only.
-* Approach 2: Store mrb file without image. Advantages: 1) more generic as is can include other meta-data, 2) all in one file, 3) prevents duplicate image data.
+* Approach 2: Store mrb file without image included (but next to original image data). Advantages: 1) more generic as is can include other meta-data, 2) all in one file, 3) prevents duplicate image data.
 * Started implementing approach 2) but encountered some problems which have to be discussed with Sunil.
 </div>
 </div>

@@ Line 23: / Line 23: @@
 <div style="width: 27%; float: left; padding-right: 3%;">
 <h3>Approach, Plan</h3>
-* Extend or build a module upon the existing XNATSlicer module (https://github.com/skumar221/XNATSlicer).
+* Extend or build a module upon the existing XNATSlicer module (https://github.com/skumar221/XNATSlicer) of Sunil Kumar.
 * Use custom variables in XNAT to store the description (and possibly other relevant information).
 </div>
 <div style="width: 27%; float: left; padding-right: 3%;">
 <h3>Progress</h3>
-* To start.
+* Approach 1: Store annotation files only.
 </div>
 </div>