CTSC:TTIC.060209 - Revision history

Valerie.humblet at 20:18, 2 June 2009

2009-06-02T20:18:19Z

Valerie.humblet: /* Harvard Translational Imaging Consortium Meeting Minutes June 2, 2009 */

2009-06-02T20:08:00Z

Harvard Translational Imaging Consortium Meeting Minutes June 2, 2009

Valerie.humblet: /* Harvard Translational Imaging Consortium Meeting Minutes June 2, 2009 */

2009-06-02T20:07:34Z

Harvard Translational Imaging Consortium Meeting Minutes June 2, 2009

Valerie.humblet: /* Harvard Translational Imaging Consortium Meeting Minutes June 2, 2009 */

2009-06-02T19:05:39Z

Harvard Translational Imaging Consortium Meeting Minutes June 2, 2009

Valerie.humblet at 18:58, 2 June 2009

2009-06-02T18:58:51Z

Valerie.humblet at 12:26, 2 June 2009

2009-06-02T12:26:50Z

Valerie.humblet: Created page with ' 1. Imaging consultation. 2. Marketing of consultation service (see attached proposed brochure) 3. Pilot grants 4. Imaging informatics update'

2009-06-02T12:26:02Z

Created page with ' 1. Imaging consultation. 2. Marketing of consultation service (see attached proposed brochure) 3. Pilot grants 4. Imaging informatics update'

New page

1. Imaging consultation.
2. Marketing of consultation service (see attached proposed brochure)
3. Pilot grants
4. Imaging informatics update

@@ Line 46: / Line 46: @@
 <br>
-'''3. Pilot grants'''
+'''3. Pilot grants''' <br>
 * There are no official numbers on the applications for the second round of pilot grants.
 * Reviewers are encouraged to add their participation to the process on their resume as it will be a factor taking into account during review for promotion.
-'''4.
+<br>

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:08, 2 June 2009
Line 49:		Line 49:

	* There are no official numbers on the applications for the second round of pilot grants.		* There are no official numbers on the applications for the second round of pilot grants.
−	* Reviewers are encouraged to add their participation to the process on their resume as it will be a factor taking into account during review ~~fro~~ promotion.	+	* Reviewers are encouraged to add their participation to the process on their resume as it will be a factor taking into account during review for promotion.
		+
		+	'''4.

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:07, 2 June 2009
Line 43:		Line 43:
	* Jeff suggested to contact the head of IRB at each institution to give them an overview of what we offer and see if they would be interested in using the consultation service to review new protocols with imaging components. Right now at DFCC for example there is no formal structure, any new protocol with imaging has to be approved through the radiation safety office.		* Jeff suggested to contact the head of IRB at each institution to give them an overview of what we offer and see if they would be interested in using the consultation service to review new protocols with imaging components. Right now at DFCC for example there is no formal structure, any new protocol with imaging has to be approved through the radiation safety office.
	* At the different institution, there is generally an intensive introduction to clinical research. It would be a very good time to target the audience (newer researchers) that would benefit from what Catalyst is offering. The members are tasked to contact the education program manager at their institution to be on the agenda of these training.		* At the different institution, there is generally an intensive introduction to clinical research. It would be a very good time to target the audience (newer researchers) that would benefit from what Catalyst is offering. The members are tasked to contact the education program manager at their institution to be on the agenda of these training.
		+
		+	<br>
		+
		+	'''3. Pilot grants'''
		+
		+	* There are no official numbers on the applications for the second round of pilot grants.
		+	* Reviewers are encouraged to add their participation to the process on their resume as it will be a factor taking into account during review fro promotion.

@@ Line 41: / Line 41: @@
 ** Gordon Williams will meet with the genetics group on Wednesday June 3 and asked for their suggestions in order to keep the brochures very similar. In the mean time, Valerie will contact Tom Ulrich to give him the imaging consortium's feedback.
 * Now that a talk about the services offered by the imaging consortium has been given at each Radiology Staff meeting, we must target divisions and other departments meetings. Having the flyer as well as some business cards to distribute  after those talks would be a plus.  Each hospital representative is tasked to get a list of 3 or 4 meetings at their institution where the consortium could give a 10-15 minutes talk this summer. Valerie will collect the data.
-* Jeff suggested to contact the head of IRB at each institution to give them an overview of what we offer and see if they would be interested in using the consultation service to review new protocols with imaging components.
+* Jeff suggested to contact the head of IRB at each institution to give them an overview of what we offer and see if they would be interested in using the consultation service to review new protocols with imaging components. Right now at DFCC for example there is no formal structure, any new protocol with imaging has to be approved through the radiation safety office.

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 # Imaging consultation.
-# Marketing of consultation service (see attached proposed brochure)
+# Marketing of consultation service
 # Pilot grants
 # Imaging informatics update