DBP2:UNC:Tissue Segmentation Evaluation - Revision history

Cvachet at 19:17, 27 August 2010

2010-08-27T19:17:08Z

2010-08-27T19:16:39Z

Results

2010-08-27T18:33:45Z

2008-03-13T13:58:48Z

Results

2008-03-12T23:07:59Z

2008-03-12T22:28:31Z

2008-03-12T21:51:01Z

2008-03-12T21:49:09Z

2008-03-12T21:24:22Z

2008-03-12T21:20:54Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:17, 27 August 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	Back to [[~~NA-MIC_Internal_Collaborations~~\|~~NA-MIC Internal Collaborations~~]], [[DBP2:UNC\|UNC ~~DBP 2~~]]	+	Back to [[DBP2:UNC:Cortical_Thickness_Roadmap \| UNC Cortical Thickness Roadmap]], [[DBP2:UNC:Regional_Cortical_Thickness_Pipeline \| UNC Regional Cortical Thickness Pipeline]]
	__NOTOC__		__NOTOC__

@@ Line 26: / Line 26: @@
    - EMSegment		7.66%		3.15%		14.84%		1.51%
-See results detailed on spreadsheet:
+See results detailed on [[Media:UNCDBP2_TissueSegmentationReliabilityStudy.xls | spreadsheet]].
 For each algorithm and each tissue, an average T1-weighted label image has been computed. Then, using the 'EvaluateSegmentationResult' tool, volume differences, average distances and tanimoto errors have been computed between each case and the previously computed average.
-See data detailed on spreadsheet:
+See data detailed on [[Media:UNCDBP2_TissueSegmentationReliabilityStudy2.xls | spreadsheet]].
 === Screenshots ===

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:33, 27 August 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	Back to [[NA-MIC_Internal_Collaborations\|NA-MIC Internal Collaborations]], [[DBP2:UNC\|UNC DBP 2]]	+	Back to [[NA-MIC_Internal_Collaborations\|NA-MIC Internal Collaborations]], [[DBP2:UNC\|UNC DBP 2]]
	__NOTOC__		__NOTOC__

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:58, 13 March 2008
Line 31:		Line 31:


−	For each algorithm and each tissue, an average T1-weighted label image has been computed. ~~Using~~ the 'EvaluateSegmentationResult' tool, volume differences and tanimoto errors between each case and the computed average ~~have also been computed~~.	+	For each algorithm and each tissue, an average T1-weighted label image has been computed. Then, using the 'EvaluateSegmentationResult' tool, volume differences, average distances and tanimoto errors have been computed between each case and the previously computed average.

	See data detailed on spreadsheet:		See data detailed on spreadsheet:

@@ Line 28: / Line 28: @@
 See results detailed on spreadsheet:
-[[Image:UNCDBP2_TissueSegmentationReliabilityStudy.xls]]
+[[Media:UNCDBP2_TissueSegmentationReliabilityStudy.xls]]
@@ Line 35: / Line 35: @@
 See data detailed on spreadsheet:
-[[Image:UNCDBP2_TissueSegmentationReliabilityStudy2.xls]]
+[[Media:UNCDBP2_TissueSegmentationReliabilityStudy2.xls]]
 === Screenshots ===

@@ Line 39: / Line 39: @@
 === Screenshots ===
+<center>
 == Qualitative study on pediatric dataset ==
@@ Line 45: / Line 50: @@
 <center>
 {|
-|[[Image:TissueSegmentation_Pediatric_EMSegment.jpg|thumb|300px|EMSegment tissue segmentation on pediatric case]]
+|[[Image:TissueSegmentation_Pediatric_EMSegment.jpg|thumb|280px|EMSegment tissue segmentation on pediatric case]]
-|valign="top"|[[Image:TissueSegmentation_Pediatric_itkEMS.jpg|thumb|300px|itkEMS tissue segmentation on pediatric case]]
+|valign="top"|[[Image:TissueSegmentation_Pediatric_itkEMS.jpg|thumb|280px|itkEMS tissue segmentation on pediatric case]]
 |}
 </center>

@@ Line 20: / Line 20: @@
 One case failed at the execution using EMSegment and has been removed.
-The covariance was computed for each trial, not only considering each tissue (White matter, grey matter and CSF), but also the Intra Cranial Volume, sum of the three tissues.
+The covariance was computed for each trial, not only considering each tissue (White Matter, Grey Matter and CSF), but also the Intra Cranial Volume, sum of the three tissues.
    - Covariance/Tissue	WM		GM		CSF		ICV

@@ Line 14: / Line 14: @@
 A UNC dataset has been used for this study, one patient being scanned 10 times on the same scanner.
 Two dual-channel segmentation trials were performed to compare the segmentation reliability using the two algorithms.
-A single T1 image was registered to the UNC template atlas and the rest of the T1 images were affinely registered and scaled to that original T1 image to minimize scanner-influenced differences.
+A single T1-weighted image was registered to the UNC template atlas and the rest of the T1 images were affinely registered and scaled to that original T1 image to minimize scanner-influenced differences.
 === Results ===
@@ Line 27: / Line 27: @@
 See results detailed on spreadsheet:
-[[Image:UNC_DBP2_TissueSegmentation_VolumeAnalysis.xls]]
 === Screenshots ===
@@ Line 34: / Line 42: @@
 == Qualitative study on pediatric dataset ==