DTI Challenge 2014 - Revision history

Spujol at 17:07, 3 September 2014

2014-09-03T17:07:01Z

Spujol at 19:41, 17 April 2014

2014-04-17T19:41:38Z

Spujol at 01:02, 22 February 2014

2014-02-22T01:02:52Z

Spujol: /* Outline */

2014-02-22T01:01:33Z

Outline

Spujol: Created page with '{| class="wikitable" | colspan="3"|Image:Miccai2014.jpg |- |Image:NAMIC.jpg‎ |Image:Logo_nac.gif‎ |Image:NCIGTlogo.gif |} [page under construction] == Intro…'

2014-02-22T01:01:02Z

Created page with '{| class="wikitable" | colspan="3"|Image:Miccai2014.jpg |- |Image:NAMIC.jpg‎ |Image:Logo_nac.gif‎ |Image:NCIGTlogo.gif |} [page under construction] == Intro…'

New page

{| class="wikitable"
| colspan="3"|[[Image:Miccai2014.jpg]]
|-
|[[Image:NAMIC.jpg‎]]
|[[Image:Logo_nac.gif‎]]
|[[Image:NCIGTlogo.gif]]
|}

[page under construction]

== Introduction ==
The 4th Edition of the MICCAI Grand Challenge on DTI Tractography will be held on Sunday September 14, 2014, as part of the [http://www.miccai2014.org/ 17th International conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention (MICCAI 2014)] in Boston, MA.

== Outline ==
DTI tractography holds promises for mapping white matter pathways in-vivo. However, the validation of tractography results remains the major bottleneck to clinical usability and utility, since neurosurgeons and scientists face the challenge of selecting the appropriate tractography method in the absence of ground truth. This workshop aims at comparing tractography algorithms performances in the reconstruction of the corticospinal tract in a controlled environment using software generated DTI phantoms and in a clinical workflow of neurosurgical cases. Quantitative evaluation criteria will be based on fiber diffusion profiles, fiber geometry and distance between bundles. Clinical assessment will focus on anatomical correctness, depiction of lesion infiltration and tract displacement.

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:41, 17 April 2014
Line 14:		Line 14:
	== Outline ==		== Outline ==
	DTI tractography holds promises for mapping white matter pathways in-vivo. However, the validation of tractography results remains the major bottleneck to clinical usability and utility, since neurosurgeons and scientists face the challenge of selecting the appropriate tractography method in the absence of ground truth. This workshop aims at comparing tractography algorithms performances in the reconstruction of the corticospinal tract in a clinical workflow of neurosurgical cases. Quantitative evaluation criteria will be based on fiber diffusion profiles, fiber geometry and distance between bundles. Clinical assessment will focus on anatomical correctness, depiction of lesion infiltration and tract displacement.		DTI tractography holds promises for mapping white matter pathways in-vivo. However, the validation of tractography results remains the major bottleneck to clinical usability and utility, since neurosurgeons and scientists face the challenge of selecting the appropriate tractography method in the absence of ground truth. This workshop aims at comparing tractography algorithms performances in the reconstruction of the corticospinal tract in a clinical workflow of neurosurgical cases. Quantitative evaluation criteria will be based on fiber diffusion profiles, fiber geometry and distance between bundles. Clinical assessment will focus on anatomical correctness, depiction of lesion infiltration and tract displacement.
		+
		+	== Website ==
		+	For participating in the MICCAI 2014 DTI Tractography Challenge, please visit [http://dti-challenge.org dti-challenge.org]

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:01, 22 February 2014
Line 13:		Line 13:

	== Outline ==		== Outline ==
−	DTI tractography holds promises for mapping white matter pathways in-vivo. However, the validation of tractography results remains the major bottleneck to clinical usability and utility, since neurosurgeons and scientists face the challenge of selecting the appropriate tractography method in the absence of ground truth. This workshop aims at comparing tractography algorithms performances in the reconstruction of the corticospinal tract ~~in a controlled environment using software generated DTI phantoms and~~ in a clinical workflow of neurosurgical cases. Quantitative evaluation criteria will be based on fiber diffusion profiles, fiber geometry and distance between bundles. Clinical assessment will focus on anatomical correctness, depiction of lesion infiltration and tract displacement.	+	DTI tractography holds promises for mapping white matter pathways in-vivo. However, the validation of tractography results remains the major bottleneck to clinical usability and utility, since neurosurgeons and scientists face the challenge of selecting the appropriate tractography method in the absence of ground truth. This workshop aims at comparing tractography algorithms performances in the reconstruction of the corticospinal tract in a clinical workflow of neurosurgical cases. Quantitative evaluation criteria will be based on fiber diffusion profiles, fiber geometry and distance between bundles. Clinical assessment will focus on anatomical correctness, depiction of lesion infiltration and tract displacement.

@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
 |}
-[page under construction]
+== Introduction ==
 == Outline ==

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 {| class="wikitable"
-| colspan="3"|[[Image:Miccai2014.jpg]]
+| colspan="3"|[[Image:MICCAI2014.jpg]]
 |-
 |[[Image:NAMIC.jpg‎]]