Engineering:Project:Non-rigid EPI registration - Revision history

Melonakos: NAMIC:NonRigidEPIRegistration moved to Engineering:Project:Non-rigid EPI registration over redirect

2007-11-26T04:24:59Z

NAMIC:NonRigidEPIRegistration moved to Engineering:Project:Non-rigid EPI registration over redirect

Melonakos: Engineering:Project:Non-rigid EPI registration moved to NAMIC:NonRigidEPIRegistration

2007-11-26T04:23:57Z

Engineering:Project:Non-rigid EPI registration moved to NAMIC:NonRigidEPIRegistration

Melonakos at 22:53, 21 September 2007

2007-09-21T22:53:02Z

Melonakos at 20:30, 20 September 2007

2007-09-20T20:30:13Z

Melonakos at 02:21, 20 September 2007

2007-09-20T02:21:15Z

Andy: Update from Wiki

2006-12-18T19:24:52Z

Update from Wiki

New page

'''Project'''<nowiki>: Non-rigid EPI registration using ITK </nowiki>

'''Use case'''<nowiki>: 'I'd like to be able to register an EPI image to a conventional structural image. This will help correct for the distortions in EPI images, and help me use tools which have been developed for conventional structural images' - Saykin </nowiki>

'''Impact'''<nowiki>: Medium (Saykin) </nowiki>

'''Difficulty'''<nowiki>: Medium (Tuch) </nowiki>

[[Media:2006_AHM_Programming_Half_Week_Non-rigid_EPI_registration.ppt| Project summary slide]]

----

'''Vision'''<nowiki>: Software tool which can perform robust non-rigid, intrasubject registration between an EPI image and a conventional structural image. </nowiki>

'''Goal'''<nowiki>: Identify optimal ITK method and parameter settings for non-rigid intrasubject registration of T2 EPI to T1 conventional. Provide software devliverable. </nowiki>

'''Test Data'''<nowiki>: We'll look at all 6 healthy individuals from the Dartmouth data set. [</nowiki>https://portal.nbirn.net/BIRN/cgi-bin/DataGrid/browse.cgi?browseloc=/home/Projects/NAMIC__0003/Files/Dartmouth/HealthyControls6/DTIdata

DTI data] and [https://portal.nbirn.net/BIRN/cgi-bin/DataGrid/browse.cgi?browseloc=/home/Projects/NAMIC__0003/Files/Dartmouth/HealthyControls6/SPGRdata

conventional data].

'''Team members'''<nowiki>: Snyder, Jen, Tuch, Ibanez </nowiki>

<br />'''Win conditions'''<nowiki>: </nowiki>

'''Kitware'''<nowiki>: Demonstration of advantages of ITK solution. Practical implementation towards DBP. </nowiki>

'''MGH'''<nowiki>: Guidance on optimal use of ITK non-rigid registration functions </nowiki>

'''Dartmouth'''<nowiki>: Software deliverable </nowiki>

<br />'''Most probable failure modes'''<nowiki>: </nowiki>

* Loss of traction

* Insufficient accuracy

* Ambiguous accuracy results (E.g., registration performance inconsistent across subjects or regions)

----

'''Steps'''<nowiki>: </nowiki>

# Requirements extraction (Tuch/Saykin): '''done'''
# Create Wiki project page (Tuch): '''done'''
# Create directory on NAMIC sandbox (Ibanez): '''done'''
# Transfer test images (Snyder): '''done'''
# Implement rigid registration method (Snyder/Ibanez): '''done'''
# Implement deformable method (Snyder/Jen): '''done'''
# Write test engine (Snyder/Jen): '''in progress'''
# Evaluate registration performance (Snyder/Jen/Ibanez/Saykin): '''queued'''
# Software deliverable (Snyder/Jen): '''queued'''

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-'''Project'''<nowiki>: Non-rigid EPI registration using ITK </nowiki>
+ Back to [[NA-MIC_Collaborations|NA-MIC_Collaborations]], [[Algorithm:MGH|MGH Algorithms]]
- Back to [[NA-MIC_Collaborations|NA-MIC_Collaborations]], [[Algorithm:MGH|MGH Algorithms]]
+= Non-rigid EPI registration using ITK =
 '''Use case'''<nowiki>: 'I'd like to be able to register an EPI image to a conventional structural image. This will help correct for the distortions in EPI images, and help me use tools which have been developed for conventional structural images' - Saykin </nowiki>
@@ Line 20: / Line 22: @@
   DTI data] and [https://portal.nbirn.net/BIRN/cgi-bin/DataGrid/browse.cgi?browseloc=/home/Projects/NAMIC__0003/Files/Dartmouth/HealthyControls6/SPGRdata
-conventional data].
+= Key Investigators =
-'''Team members'''<nowiki>: Snyder, Jen, Tuch, Ibanez </nowiki>
+ Snyder, Jen, Tuch, Ibanez
 <br />'''Win conditions'''<nowiki>: </nowiki>
-'''Kitware'''<nowiki>: Demonstration of advantages of ITK solution. Practical implementation towards DBP. </nowiki>
+''Kitware''<nowiki>: Demonstration of advantages of ITK solution. Practical implementation towards DBP. </nowiki>
-'''MGH'''<nowiki>: Guidance on optimal use of ITK non-rigid registration functions </nowiki>
+''MGH''<nowiki>: Guidance on optimal use of ITK non-rigid registration functions </nowiki>
-'''Dartmouth'''<nowiki>: Software deliverable </nowiki>
+''Dartmouth''<nowiki>: Software deliverable </nowiki>
 <br />'''Most probable failure modes'''<nowiki>: </nowiki>
@@ Line 43: / Line 46: @@
 ----
-'''Steps'''<nowiki>: </nowiki>
+''Steps''<nowiki>: </nowiki>
 # Requirements extraction (Tuch/Saykin): '''done'''
@@ Line 57: / Line 60: @@
 Statistical power benefit of ITK nonlinear registration
-* '''Use case'''<nowiki>: 'Evaluate benefit of using ITK nonlinear registration for group FA comparisons' </nowiki>
+* ''Use case''<nowiki>: 'Evaluate benefit of using ITK nonlinear registration for group FA comparisons' </nowiki>
 * Difficulty: Low-Medium
 * Impact: Medium

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:30, 20 September 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''Project'''<nowiki>: Non-rigid EPI registration using ITK </nowiki>		'''Project'''<nowiki>: Non-rigid EPI registration using ITK </nowiki>
		+
		+	Back to [[NA-MIC_Collaborations\|NA-MIC_Collaborations]], [[Algorithm:MGH\|MGH Algorithms]]

	'''Use case'''<nowiki>: 'I'd like to be able to register an EPI image to a conventional structural image. This will help correct for the distortions in EPI images, and help me use tools which have been developed for conventional structural images' - Saykin </nowiki>		'''Use case'''<nowiki>: 'I'd like to be able to register an EPI image to a conventional structural image. This will help correct for the distortions in EPI images, and help me use tools which have been developed for conventional structural images' - Saykin </nowiki>

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:21, 20 September 2007
Line 52:		Line 52:
	# Evaluate registration performance (Snyder/Jen/Ibanez/Saykin): '''queued'''		# Evaluate registration performance (Snyder/Jen/Ibanez/Saykin): '''queued'''
	# Software deliverable (Snyder/Jen): '''queued'''		# Software deliverable (Snyder/Jen): '''queued'''
		+
		+	Statistical power benefit of ITK nonlinear registration
		+
		+	* '''Use case'''<nowiki>: 'Evaluate benefit of using ITK nonlinear registration for group FA comparisons' </nowiki>
		+	* Difficulty: Low-Medium
		+	* Impact: Medium