Projects:QuantitativeSusceptibilityMapping - Revision history

Rameshvs: Undo revision 78400 by Rameshvs (Talk)

2012-11-28T19:47:45Z

Undo revision 78400 by Rameshvs (Talk)

2012-11-28T19:42:15Z

2011-03-27T22:40:27Z

Forward Model (Eq. 1)

2011-03-27T21:40:21Z

Key Investigators

2011-03-27T21:40:06Z

2011-03-27T21:27:42Z

References

2011-03-27T21:27:29Z

2011-03-27T21:25:57Z

2011-03-27T21:25:16Z

2011-03-27T21:23:09Z

Future Directions

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:47, 28 November 2012
Line 84:		Line 84:
	* Harvard/BWH: William Wells		* Harvard/BWH: William Wells
	* Stanford: Adolf Pfefferbaum, Edith Sullivan		* Stanford: Adolf Pfefferbaum, Edith Sullivan
−
−	~~= Publications =~~
−
−	[http://www.na-mic.org/publications/pages/display?search=Projects:QuantitativeSusceptibilityMapping&submit=Search&words=all&title=checked&keywords=checked&authors=checked&abstract=checked&sponsors=checked&searchbytag=checked\| NA-MIC Publications Database on Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping]

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:42, 28 November 2012
Line 84:		Line 84:
	* Harvard/BWH: William Wells		* Harvard/BWH: William Wells
	* Stanford: Adolf Pfefferbaum, Edith Sullivan		* Stanford: Adolf Pfefferbaum, Edith Sullivan
		+
		+	= Publications =
		+
		+	[http://www.na-mic.org/publications/pages/display?search=Projects:QuantitativeSusceptibilityMapping&submit=Search&words=all&title=checked&keywords=checked&authors=checked&abstract=checked&sponsors=checked&searchbytag=checked\| NA-MIC Publications Database on Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping]

@@ Line 25: / Line 25: @@
 == Forward Model (Eq. 1) ==
-The forward model relates the perturbing field to the unknown susceptibility through a local term and convolution of the second z-derivative of the Green’s function of the Laplacian [3].
+The forward model relates the perturbing field to the unknown susceptibility through a local term and convolution of the second z-derivative of the Green’s function of the Laplacian with the unknown susceptibility map [3].
 == Bias Field Elimination (Eq. 2) ==

@@ Line 81: / Line 81: @@
 = Key Investigators =
-* MIT: Clare Poynton, Elfar Adalsteinsson, Polina Golland
+* MIT: Clare Poynton, Elfar Adalsteinsson
 * Harvard/BWH: William Wells
 * Stanford: Adolf Pfefferbaum, Edith Sullivan

@@ Line 68: / Line 68: @@
 = References =
 . Zecca L, et al. Nat Rev Neurosci, 5:863{73, Nov 2004.
@@ Line 77: / Line 78: @@
 . Weisskoff RM, et al. MRM. 1992. 24(2):375.

@@ Line 69: / Line 69: @@
 = References =
 . Zecca L, et al. Nat Rev Neurosci, 5:863{73, Nov 2004.
 . Lustig M,et al. MRM. 2007. 58(6):1182.
 . Jenkinson M, et al. MRM. 2004. 52(3):471.
 . de Rochefort L, et al. MRM.2010. 63(1):194.
 . Weisskoff RM, et al. MRM. 1992. 24(2):375.

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:25, 27 March 2011
Line 66:		Line 66:
	\|[[File:Miccai fig1 crop.png\|thumb\|600px\|Fig 5. The field map (left), laplacian of the field (center) and estimated susceptibility map (right) for a young healthy subject is shown. Taking the Laplacian of the fieldmap successfully eliminates the substantial biasfields in the observed field. The estimated susceptibility map shares similar high frequency structure with the Laplacian of the observed field while low frequency structure is preserved by additional modeling constraints.]]		\|[[File:Miccai fig1 crop.png\|thumb\|600px\|Fig 5. The field map (left), laplacian of the field (center) and estimated susceptibility map (right) for a young healthy subject is shown. Taking the Laplacian of the fieldmap successfully eliminates the substantial biasfields in the observed field. The estimated susceptibility map shares similar high frequency structure with the Laplacian of the observed field while low frequency structure is preserved by additional modeling constraints.]]
	\|}		\|}
		+
		+	= References =
		+
		+	1. Lustig M,et al. MRM. 2007. 58(6):1182.
		+	2. Jenkinson M, et al. MRM. 2004. 52(3):471.
		+	3. de Rochefort L, et al. MRM.2010. 63(1):194.
		+	4. Weisskoff RM, et al. MRM. 1992. 24(2):375.
		+	5. Cantillon-Murphy P, et al. NMR in Biomedicine, 2009. 22: 891.
		+	6. http://www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fsl/.

@@ Line 64: / Line 64: @@
 {|
-|[[File:Miccai fig1 crop.png|thumb|800px|Fig 5. The field map (left), laplacian of the field (center) and estimated susceptibility map (right) for a young healthy subject is shown. Taking the Laplacian of the fieldmap successfully eliminates the substantial biasfields in the observed field. The estimated susceptibility map shares similar high frequency structure with the Laplacian of the observed field while low frequency structure is preserved by additional modeling constraints.]]
+|[[File:Miccai fig1 crop.png|thumb|600px|Fig 5. The field map (left), laplacian of the field (center) and estimated susceptibility map (right) for a young healthy subject is shown. Taking the Laplacian of the fieldmap successfully eliminates the substantial biasfields in the observed field. The estimated susceptibility map shares similar high frequency structure with the Laplacian of the observed field while low frequency structure is preserved by additional modeling constraints.]]
 |}