<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.na-mic.org/w/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Talk%3AAHM_2005%3AFeedback</id>
	<title>Talk:AHM 2005:Feedback - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.na-mic.org/w/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Talk%3AAHM_2005%3AFeedback"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.na-mic.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:AHM_2005:Feedback&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-05-02T04:49:40Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.33.0</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.na-mic.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:AHM_2005:Feedback&amp;diff=3271&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Andy: Update from Wiki</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.na-mic.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:AHM_2005:Feedback&amp;diff=3271&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2006-12-18T13:19:25Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Update from Wiki&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;== Feedback Items ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Content: Was there any material that you would have liked to see more/less of during the meeting?&lt;br /&gt;
# Was the balance between presentations and working discussions reasonable? Would you like to see more/less of either?&lt;br /&gt;
# Was there a good balance between whole-group vs. core-specific time? Any suggestions for change for next time?&lt;br /&gt;
# Was the duration of the meeting reasonable? Would you prefer it to be longer/shorter?&lt;br /&gt;
# Have you found the Wiki to be a useful communication tool? Any suggestions for additional tools?&lt;br /&gt;
# Location: how did the location work out in terms of accessibility, facilities and general hospitality?&lt;br /&gt;
# Next AHM: Please submit suggestions for the next AHM location. If you would like to host it, please also send a private email to Ron Kikinis.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== AHM Feeback ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Content: Was there any material that you would have liked to see more/less of during the meeting?&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;no&lt;br /&gt;
# Was the balance between presentations and working discussions reasonable? Would you like to see more/less of either?&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;very good&lt;br /&gt;
# Was there a good balance between whole-group vs. core-specific time? Any suggestions for change for next time?&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;I liked the balance. In the future, core-specific work might even be done outside of the AHM meetings since groups start to organize themselves. I see the main purpose of the AHM to have whole-group discussions.&lt;br /&gt;
# Was the duration of the meeting reasonable? Would you prefer it to be longer/shorter?&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;There is surely never an optimal time for such a meeting. In general, for those of us involved in teaching, any time during the semester is more difficult. The same is true for graduate students in their lower semesters.&lt;br /&gt;
# Have you found the Wiki to be a useful communication tool? Any suggestions for additional tools?&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;Excellent tool, it facilitated communication of material during this meeting tremendously.&lt;br /&gt;
# Location: how did the location work out in terms of accessibility, facilities and general hospitality?&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;very nice and convenient place, I enjoyed it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== AHM Feedback ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
   1.  Content:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The DTI workshop was very useful. The main meeting struck a good balance between engineering and research for me.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
   2. Was the balance between presentations and working discussions reasonable? Would you like to see more/less of either?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fairly reasonable, could have been slightly more focus on working discussions. Maybe next time make it explicit that 15min or more out of every hour slotted for a presentation is reserved for discussion so rushing is avoided.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
   3. Was there a good balance between whole-group vs. core-specific time? Any suggestions for change for next time?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A little more core specific time would have been useful.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
   4. Was the duration of the meeting reasonable? Would you prefer it to be longer/shorter?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There needed to be more regular comfort breaks - sitting in one place for four hours during one stretch was very uncomfortable. As for number of days we met and the hours we used, that was reasonable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
   5. Have you found the Wiki to be a useful communication tool? Any suggestions for additional tools?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes, though it can always use a bit more organization. Maybe use it to schedule teleconferences and report back on them. It would be useful to have summaries of the breakout sessions from the last day.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
   6. Location: how did the location work out in terms of accessibility, facilities and general hospitality?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Great. I was glad to see that more tea was provided during the breaks as the meetings went on. There could have been a bit more effort to accommodate vegetarians/vegans.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
   7. Next AHM: Please submit suggestions for the next AHM location. If you would like to host it, please also send a private email to Ron Kikinis.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Andy</name></author>
		
	</entry>
</feed>