Difference between revisions of "DBP2:MIND:Roadmap"

From NAMIC Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
==Objective==
 
==Objective==
−
We would like to create an end-to-end application within NA-MIC Kit allowing individual and group analysis of white matter lesions. Such a workflow applied to lupus patients is one goals of the MIND DBP. This page describes the technology roadmap for lesion analysis in the NA-MIC Kit. The basic components necessary for this end-to-end application are:
+
We would like to create an end-to-end application within NA-MIC Kit allowing individual analysis of white matter lesions. Such a workflow applied to lupus patients is one goals of the MIND DBP. This page describes the technology roadmap for lesion analysis in the NA-MIC Kit. The basic components necessary for this end-to-end application are:
 
* '''Registration''': co-registration of T1-weighted, T2-weighted, and FLAIR images
 
* '''Registration''': co-registration of T1-weighted, T2-weighted, and FLAIR images
 
* '''Tissue segmentation''': Should be multi-modality, correcting for intensity inhomogeneity and work on non-skull-stripped data.
 
* '''Tissue segmentation''': Should be multi-modality, correcting for intensity inhomogeneity and work on non-skull-stripped data.
 
* '''Lesion Localization''':  Each unique lesion should be detacted and anatomical location summarized  
 
* '''Lesion Localization''':  Each unique lesion should be detacted and anatomical location summarized  
 
* '''Lesion Load Measurement''': Measure volume of each lesion, summarize lesion load by regions
 
* '''Lesion Load Measurement''': Measure volume of each lesion, summarize lesion load by regions
−
* '''Statistical analysis/Hypothesis testing''': Lesion Measurements need to be compared and tested locally incorporating multiple-comparison correction, correlative analysis would be necessary too.
+
* '''Tutorial''': Documentation will be written for a tutorial and sample data sets will be provided
  
  
Line 36: Line 36:
  
 
=== Performance characterization and validation ===
 
=== Performance characterization and validation ===
−
* Characterize response based on signal noise, patient motion, etc.
+
:* Data will be collected at both 1.5 and 3T. Data at 1.5T will be obtained with the protocol utilized for current project on lupus at UNM.
−
* Comparison to other tools (FreeSurfer, itkEMS, UNC cortical thickness).  
+
:* Data at 3T will be obtained with sequences optimized for segmentation by the group at Utah.
−
 
+
:* Comparisons will be based on the approach developed by Martin-Fernandez et al.
−
 
+
:* The algorithm with the best performance will be incorporated into the NA-MIC kit.
−
 
 
−
 
 
−
 
 
−
 
 
−
 
−
1) The tools developed by the UNC group (marcel)
 
−
 
−
2) The tools developed by the BWH group (EM-segment with lesion segmentation)
 
−
 
 
−
3) Tools within Medx (automated lesion classification package)
 
−
 
−
4) BRAINS2 (automated lesion classification package)
 
−
 
−
5) manual tracing
 
 
   
 
   
−
Data will be collected at both 1.5 and 3T. Data at 1.5T will be obtained with the protocol utilized for current project on lupus at UNM.
+
=== Schedule ===
−
 
 
−
Data at 3T will be obtained with sequences optimized for segmentation by the group at Utah.
 
−
 
 
−
Comparisons will be based on the approach developed by Martin-Fernandez et al.
 
−
 
−
 
−
Incorporation into NA-MIC Kit
 
−
 
−
The algorithm with the best performance will be incorporated in Slicer3.
 
−
 
−
 
−
Tutorial
 
−
Documentation will be written for a tutorial and sample data sets will be provided
 
−
 
−
 
−
Hypothesis Testing
 
−
 
 
−
 
 
−
Performance characterization and validation
 
−
 
 
−
 
 
−
Schedule
 

Revision as of 09:52, 27 September 2007

Home < DBP2:MIND:Roadmap

Brain Lesion Analysis in Neuropsychiatric Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Objective

We would like to create an end-to-end application within NA-MIC Kit allowing individual analysis of white matter lesions. Such a workflow applied to lupus patients is one goals of the MIND DBP. This page describes the technology roadmap for lesion analysis in the NA-MIC Kit. The basic components necessary for this end-to-end application are:

  • Registration: co-registration of T1-weighted, T2-weighted, and FLAIR images
  • Tissue segmentation: Should be multi-modality, correcting for intensity inhomogeneity and work on non-skull-stripped data.
  • Lesion Localization: Each unique lesion should be detacted and anatomical location summarized
  • Lesion Load Measurement: Measure volume of each lesion, summarize lesion load by regions
  • Tutorial: Documentation will be written for a tutorial and sample data sets will be provided


Roadmap

Starting with several MRI images (weighted-T1, weighted-T2, FLAIR...) we want to obtain lesion maps for each subject. Ultimately, the NA-MIC Kit will provide a workflow for individual and group analysis of lesions. It will be implemented as a set of Slicer3 modules that can be used interactively within the Slicer3 application as well as in batch on a computing cluster using BatchMake.

Next we discuss the main modules and details of current status and development work:

Registration

  • ITK has mutual information registration
  • BRAINS2 has AIR package wrapped

Lesion segmentation

A number of algorithms for fully or semi-automated lesion analysis will be evaluated on brain images from subjects in a study on lupus erythematosis. These include:

  • UNC has a tool called itkEMS Compare Lesion Analysis Tools (marcel)
  • EM-segment (sandy wells)
  • MedX (commercial package)
  • BRAINS2 (magnotta)
  • manual tracing by clinically trained rater

Lesion Localization

  • Freesurfer has tools for labelling
  • BRAINS2

Lesion Load Measurement

  • Freesurfer has tools for measurement of labelled lesions
  • BRAINS2 has tools for measurement of lesions and regional summaries

Performance characterization and validation

  • Data will be collected at both 1.5 and 3T. Data at 1.5T will be obtained with the protocol utilized for current project on lupus at UNM.
  • Data at 3T will be obtained with sequences optimized for segmentation by the group at Utah.
  • Comparisons will be based on the approach developed by Martin-Fernandez et al.
  • The algorithm with the best performance will be incorporated into the NA-MIC kit.

Schedule