Difference between revisions of "2017 Winter Project Week/LORDWI"
From NAMIC Wiki
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
* Discuss best ways to validate results (tractography, biomarkers, synthetic data, phantoms, others?). So far we have visually tested inter-subject registrations of HCP data and intra-subject multi-shell, and intra-subject on young brain tumor subjects. | * Discuss best ways to validate results (tractography, biomarkers, synthetic data, phantoms, others?). So far we have visually tested inter-subject registrations of HCP data and intra-subject multi-shell, and intra-subject on young brain tumor subjects. | ||
* Consider if Slicer can be used in tandem for evaluation. | * Consider if Slicer can be used in tandem for evaluation. | ||
| + | * This method introduces Mutual Information to nonrigid registration of DWI. Discuss if other similarity measures (e.g. correlation measures) would be better suited for specific problems. | ||
| | | | ||
<!-- Progress and Next steps bullet points (fill out at the end of project week) --> | <!-- Progress and Next steps bullet points (fill out at the end of project week) --> | ||
Revision as of 15:32, 2 January 2017
Home < 2017 Winter Project Week < LORDWIKey Investigators
- Henrik Groenholt Jensen, UCPH
- Lauren J. O'Donnell, BWH
- Tina Kapur, BWH
- Fan Zhang, BWH
- Carl-Frederik Westin, BWH
Project Description
| Objective | Approach and Plan | Progress and Next Steps |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
Background and References
- MICCAI paper on early framework: http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-24571-3_37