Difference between revisions of "2008 Core 1 Core 3 mtg:notes"
From NAMIC Wiki
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Additional discussion: | Additional discussion: | ||
− | * Slicer3 release date? Some question regarding proper handling of | + | * Slicer3 release date? Some question regarding proper handling of coordinate frames in Slicer3. |
− | coordinate frames in Slicer3. | + | * Discussion of registration and existing/needed tools in Slicer 3. Discussion postponed to registration session. |
− | * Discussion of registration and existing/needed tools in Slicer 3. | + | * Discussion re bias field correction and EM seg -> perhaps moreCore3/Core1 interaction needed |
− | Discussion postponed to registration session. | ||
− | * Discussion re bias field correction and EM seg -> perhaps | ||
− | |||
9:50 Queen's U not here yet -> talk postponed | 9:50 Queen's U not here yet -> talk postponed | ||
9:50 UNC Rachel Smith talk. | 9:50 UNC Rachel Smith talk. | ||
− | Slides. Longitudinal study of brain devel. in autism. | + | Slides. Longitudinal study of brain devel. in autism. Additional discussion: |
− | Additional discussion: | + | * Brief discussion of segmentation methods for brain substructure segmentations |
− | * Brief discussion of segmentation methods for brain substructure | + | * Additional clarification/specifics of the status of the processing of datasets |
− | segmentations | + | * Status of Marcel segmentation modules and issues re Core2/1 interaction issues -> Utah (Guido, Marcel) waiting for resolution of some critical Core2 software infrastructure issues e.g. chaining infrastructure design before |
− | * Additional clarification/specifics of the status of the processing of | ||
− | datasets | ||
− | * Status of Marcel segmentation modules and issues re Core2/1 interaction | ||
− | issues -> Utah (Guido, Marcel) waiting for resolution of some critical Core2 | ||
− | software infrastructure issues e.g. chaining infrastructure design before | ||
they can finalize tools | they can finalize tools | ||
− | * Cortical thickness measurment algorithms-> Advantages/drawbacks of | + | * Cortical thickness measurment algorithms-> Advantages/drawbacks of different methods. Guido: we should compare methods and see difference in simpler vs. more complex algorithms. Martin: Core 3 intends to look at this issue |
− | different methods. Guido: we should compare methods and see difference in | + | * Cortical correspondence-> Martin gives update on local correspondence methods status (particle method with freesurfer preprocessing). Issue: Freesurfer not working for pediatric data. Critical Freesurfer functionality will be reimplemented as NAMIC tool |
− | simpler vs. more complex algorithms. Martin: Core 3 intends to look at this | ||
− | issue | ||
− | * Cortical correspondence-> Martin gives update on local correspondence | ||
− | methods status (particle method with freesurfer preprocessing). | ||
− | Issue: Freesurfer not working for pediatric data. Critical | ||
− | Freesurfer functionality will be reimplemented as NAMIC tool | ||
10:20 break | 10:20 break |
Revision as of 17:21, 22 May 2008
Home < 2008 Core 1 Core 3 mtg:notesCore 3 Presentations
9:30 B&W/Harvard Marek Kubicki, Core 3 Talk. Slides. Stochastic Tractography
Additional discussion:
- Slicer3 release date? Some question regarding proper handling of coordinate frames in Slicer3.
- Discussion of registration and existing/needed tools in Slicer 3. Discussion postponed to registration session.
- Discussion re bias field correction and EM seg -> perhaps moreCore3/Core1 interaction needed
9:50 Queen's U not here yet -> talk postponed
9:50 UNC Rachel Smith talk. Slides. Longitudinal study of brain devel. in autism. Additional discussion:
- Brief discussion of segmentation methods for brain substructure segmentations
- Additional clarification/specifics of the status of the processing of datasets
- Status of Marcel segmentation modules and issues re Core2/1 interaction issues -> Utah (Guido, Marcel) waiting for resolution of some critical Core2 software infrastructure issues e.g. chaining infrastructure design before
they can finalize tools
- Cortical thickness measurment algorithms-> Advantages/drawbacks of different methods. Guido: we should compare methods and see difference in simpler vs. more complex algorithms. Martin: Core 3 intends to look at this issue
- Cortical correspondence-> Martin gives update on local correspondence methods status (particle method with freesurfer preprocessing). Issue: Freesurfer not working for pediatric data. Critical Freesurfer functionality will be reimplemented as NAMIC tool
10:20 break