Difference between revisions of "2008 Core 1 Core 3 mtg:notes"

From NAMIC Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 20: Line 20:
  
 
10:20 break
 
10:20 break
 +
 +
Jeremy Bockholt (DPB lupus)
 +
* collecting new data/ ongoing clinical study (old data)
 +
* discussion about how DTI sequences are selected
 +
* discussion about analysis of lesion growth and identification in follow up images
 +
** ability to find follow up lesions
 +
** growth may merge lesions.  lesions may disappear.  not expected for lesions to move
 +
* question to test - does lesion information correlate with clinical measures/outcomes
 +
* Discussion of classification comparison for lesions
 +
* Comment on the MICCAI workshop on MS lesions segmentation
 +
* Discussion on methods for segmentation comparison
 +
* Discussion of commercial tool JIM
 +
 +
== Core 1 Presentations ==
 +
 +
John Melonakos

Revision as of 17:38, 22 May 2008

Home < 2008 Core 1 Core 3 mtg:notes

Core 3 Presentations

9:30 B&W/Harvard Marek Kubicki, Core 3 Talk. Slides. Stochastic Tractography

Additional discussion:

  • Slicer3 release date? Some question regarding proper handling of coordinate frames in Slicer3.
  • Discussion of registration and existing/needed tools in Slicer 3. Discussion postponed to registration session.
  • Discussion re bias field correction and EM seg -> perhaps moreCore3/Core1 interaction needed

9:50 Queen's U not here yet -> talk postponed

9:50 UNC Rachel Smith talk. Slides. Longitudinal study of brain devel. in autism. Additional discussion:

  • Brief discussion of segmentation methods for brain substructure segmentations
  • Additional clarification/specifics of the status of the processing of datasets
  • Status of Marcel segmentation modules and issues re Core2/1 interaction issues -> Utah (Guido, Marcel) waiting for resolution of some critical Core2 software infrastructure issues e.g. chaining infrastructure design before

they can finalize tools

  • Cortical thickness measurment algorithms-> Advantages/drawbacks of different methods. Guido: we should compare methods and see difference in simpler vs. more complex algorithms. Martin: Core 3 intends to look at this issue
  • Cortical correspondence-> Martin gives update on local correspondence methods status (particle method with freesurfer preprocessing). Issue: Freesurfer not working for pediatric data. Critical Freesurfer functionality will be reimplemented as NAMIC tool

10:20 break

Jeremy Bockholt (DPB lupus)

  • collecting new data/ ongoing clinical study (old data)
  • discussion about how DTI sequences are selected
  • discussion about analysis of lesion growth and identification in follow up images
    • ability to find follow up lesions
    • growth may merge lesions. lesions may disappear. not expected for lesions to move
  • question to test - does lesion information correlate with clinical measures/outcomes
  • Discussion of classification comparison for lesions
  • Comment on the MICCAI workshop on MS lesions segmentation
  • Discussion on methods for segmentation comparison
  • Discussion of commercial tool JIM

Core 1 Presentations

John Melonakos