Difference between revisions of "2008 IGT Project Week Tractography for Neurosurgery: Workflow feedback"
From NAMIC Wiki
(New page: Back to 2008_IGT_Project_Week#Projects Team: Goals: Approach: Results (to be completed and presented at the end of the week):) |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Back to [[2008_IGT_Project_Week#Projects]] | Back to [[2008_IGT_Project_Week#Projects]] | ||
− | Team: | + | Team: Isaih Norton, Jean-Jacques Lemaire, Steve Pieper, Haiying Liu |
− | Goals: | + | Goals: |
+ | #To present the workflow used by the neurosurgical team to create real-time tractography, and get feedback from Slicer experts on whether the tasks can be achieved in a simpler way. | ||
+ | #To present a list of bugs/feature requests that hinder the current neurosurgical use of this application (in order of priority) and find out when the fixes might be available, or if there are workarounds | ||
− | Approach: | + | Approach: Discussions and hands-on demonstrations of how the software is used by the neurosurgery team. |
Results (to be completed and presented at the end of the week): | Results (to be completed and presented at the end of the week): |
Revision as of 01:49, 3 December 2008
Home < 2008 IGT Project Week Tractography for Neurosurgery: Workflow feedbackBack to 2008_IGT_Project_Week#Projects
Team: Isaih Norton, Jean-Jacques Lemaire, Steve Pieper, Haiying Liu
Goals:
- To present the workflow used by the neurosurgical team to create real-time tractography, and get feedback from Slicer experts on whether the tasks can be achieved in a simpler way.
- To present a list of bugs/feature requests that hinder the current neurosurgical use of this application (in order of priority) and find out when the fixes might be available, or if there are workarounds
Approach: Discussions and hands-on demonstrations of how the software is used by the neurosurgery team.
Results (to be completed and presented at the end of the week):