Difference between revisions of "2009 Summer Project Week HAMMER Registration"

From NAMIC Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
 
(8 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
 
Image:HammerAttribute.jpg|Components of Hammer Attribute Vectors.
 
Image:HammerAttribute.jpg|Components of Hammer Attribute Vectors.
 
Image:HammerSimilarity.png|Similarity map (middle column) computed on moving image (right) for the selected point on the fixed image (left, cross). Point indicated by a cross on the middle and right column is the point on the moving image that is the most similar to the picked point on the fixed image.
 
Image:HammerSimilarity.png|Similarity map (middle column) computed on moving image (right) for the selected point on the fixed image (left, cross). Point indicated by a cross on the middle and right column is the point on the moving image that is the most similar to the picked point on the fixed image.
Image: namic.png|The output deformation filed by HAMMER
+
Image: namic.png|The output deformation filed by HAMMER.
Image:hammer.jpg|User interface in Slicer.
 
 
</gallery>
 
</gallery>
  
Line 29: Line 28:
  
 
<h3>Progress</h3>
 
<h3>Progress</h3>
Since winter project week in Utah, we have developed/implemented HAMMER registration algorithm using ITK classes. New ITK classes have been created for tasks of HAMMER. Each component has been tested. The source code is version controlled at NITRC site. The current development corresponds to the original Hammer algorithm that is based on tissue classification of T1 weighted images (as outlined on the first HAMMER paper).
+
Since summer project week in Boston, we have integrated HAMMER into Slicer as a moduler. Each component has been tested. We have made the tutorial to present how to use HAMMER in Slicer3. The source code is version controlled at NITRC site. The current development corresponds to the original Hammer algorithm that is based on tissue classification of T1 weighted images (as outlined on the first HAMMER paper).
  
 
</div>
 
</div>
Line 37: Line 36:
 
<div style="width: 27%; float: left; padding-right: 3%; color: red;">
 
<div style="width: 27%; float: left; padding-right: 3%; color: red;">
  
<h3>Progress in this na-mic meeting</h3>
 
We have finished following work in this na-mic project meeting:
 
  
1. Implemented the framework of multi-resolution.
 
 
2. Integrated affine registration as the pre-processing step before HAMMER algorithm.
 
 
3. Build up the interface for algorithm.
 
 
</div>
 
<div style="margin: 20px;">
 
<div style="width: 27%; float: left; padding-right: 3%; color: red;">
 
 
<h3>Future plan</h3>
 
We will continue developping and testing our project after Na-mic meeting. Below is the TO-DO list:
 
 
1. Automatically performing skull striping;
 
 
2. Integrating HAMMER algorithm as the the module in Slicer
 
 
3. Do extensive test on the algorithm and release to the Na-mic community.
 
 
</div>
 
 
<h3>Users List</h3>
 
<h3>Users List</h3>
 
We have released our registration method to the Na-mic society. Below is the list of users:
 
We have released our registration method to the Na-mic society. Below is the list of users:

Latest revision as of 05:35, 4 January 2010

Home < 2009 Summer Project Week HAMMER Registration

Key Investigators

  • UNC: Guorong Wu, Dinggang Shen
  • GE : Xiaodong Tao, Jim Miller

Objective

We will continue developping and testing HAMMER registration algorithm implemented using ITK. The goal is to have an initial version ready by the end of the week that can be distributed within NA-MIC community for more extensive testing.

Approach, Plan

We will develop a Slicer module for the current implementation of the Hammer registration algorithm and test on images from multiple sources to make the algorithm robust and easy to use. Base line results and test will be generated.

Progress

Since summer project week in Boston, we have integrated HAMMER into Slicer as a moduler. Each component has been tested. We have made the tutorial to present how to use HAMMER in Slicer3. The source code is version controlled at NITRC site. The current development corresponds to the original Hammer algorithm that is based on tissue classification of T1 weighted images (as outlined on the first HAMMER paper).


Users List

We have released our registration method to the Na-mic society. Below is the list of users:

1. Minjie Wu, Geriatric Psychiatry Neuroimaging Lab, University of Pittsburgh

References