Difference between revisions of "2011 Winter Project Week:Breakout Pathology and Longitudinal Followup"
From NAMIC Wiki
Hjmjohnson (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
*Mark Scully, Iowa | *Mark Scully, Iowa | ||
*Joy Matsui, Iowa | *Joy Matsui, Iowa | ||
| + | *Xiaodong Tao, GE Research | ||
*also invited: John Van Horn, UCLA | *also invited: John Van Horn, UCLA | ||
*etc., everyone interested in this topic is welcome to attend | *etc., everyone interested in this topic is welcome to attend | ||
Revision as of 20:25, 11 January 2011
Home < 2011 Winter Project Week:Breakout Pathology and Longitudinal FollowupBack to Project Week Agenda
Session Leader:Guido Gerig
Informal discussion on development and implementation of:
- a) methods towards segmentation and visualization of pathology
- b) methodology required to assess follow-up data with and without pathology
The session was mainly motivated by questions in regard to the UCLA DBP project on TBI, but the discussion might be relevant to all other clinical subject-specific analysis involving pathology and/or serial or longitudinal data.
Expected Participants
- Guido Gerig, Utah
- Stephen Aylward, Kitware
- Marcel Prastawa, Utah
- Martin Styner, UNC
- Micah Chambers, UCLA
- Andrei Irmia, UCLA
- Bo Wang, Utah
- Anuja Sharma, Utah
- Hans Johnson, Iowa
- Mark Scully, Iowa
- Joy Matsui, Iowa
- Xiaodong Tao, GE Research
- also invited: John Van Horn, UCLA
- etc., everyone interested in this topic is welcome to attend
