Difference between revisions of "2011 Winter Project Week:Command line module logic redesign"
From NAMIC Wiki
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
<h3>Objective</h3> | <h3>Objective</h3> | ||
| + | Develop mechanisms for CommandLineModules to be | ||
| + | |||
| + | * More interactive | ||
| + | ** return intermediate results | ||
| + | ** steerable | ||
| + | * More autonomous | ||
| + | ** automatically execute with changes in MRML | ||
| + | * High level task oriented | ||
| + | ** chain modules together into workflows | ||
| + | |||
| + | while maintaining the simple conceptual model of SEM. | ||
| + | |||
| + | <!-- | ||
| + | |||
Refactor the CommandLineModuleLogic for the Slicer Execution Model (SEM). | Refactor the CommandLineModuleLogic for the Slicer Execution Model (SEM). | ||
| Line 24: | Line 38: | ||
* garbage collection | * garbage collection | ||
| − | + | --> | |
</div> | </div> | ||
Revision as of 18:05, 5 January 2011
Home < 2011 Winter Project Week:Command line module logic redesign
Key Investigators
- Isomics: Steve Pieper
- GE: Jim Miller
Objective
Develop mechanisms for CommandLineModules to be
- More interactive
- return intermediate results
- steerable
- More autonomous
- automatically execute with changes in MRML
- High level task oriented
- chain modules together into workflows
while maintaining the simple conceptual model of SEM.
Approach, Plan
Progress
Delivery Mechanism
This work will be delivered to the NA-MIC Kit as a (please select the appropriate options by noting YES against them below)
- ITK Module
- Slicer Module YES
- Built-in
- Extension -- commandline
- Extension -- loadable
- Other (Please specify) .
