Difference between revisions of "2012 Summer Project Week:4D shape analysis"

From NAMIC Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 29: Line 29:
 
<h3>Progress</h3>
 
<h3>Progress</h3>
  
We considered the input format, which presents a trade off between ease of use and robustness.  The easiest input format from a user's point of view would be segmentation label images.  However, these leads to issues with mesh extraction, simplification, smoothing, etc.  We have found that the most realistic input to the system should be aligned, simplified meshes.  It is up to the user to provide aligned meshes of adequate quality and reasonable complexity.
+
We considered the input format, which presents a trade off between ease of use and robustness.  The easiest input format from a user's point of view would be segmentation label images.  However, this choice leads to issues with mesh extraction, simplification, smoothing, etc.  We have concluded that the most realistic input to the system should be aligned, simplified meshes.  It is up to the user to provide aligned meshes of adequate quality and reasonable complexity.
  
 
</div>
 
</div>

Revision as of 21:39, 18 June 2012

Home < 2012 Summer Project Week:4D shape analysis

Key Investigators

  • Utah: James Fishbaugh, Marcel Prastawa, Guido Gerig

Objective

We are interested in detecting and quantifying shape changes associated with the progression of Huntington's disease. Preliminary experiments on sub-cortical structures in HD from previous project weeks were intended as a test of our methodology. In order to have an impact moving forward, our tools needs to be robust, easy to use, and available as open-source software. The objective is to improve upon our research code base, leveraging open source libraries.

Approach, Plan

We will consider various software design decisions and begin improving research code.

Progress

We considered the input format, which presents a trade off between ease of use and robustness. The easiest input format from a user's point of view would be segmentation label images. However, this choice leads to issues with mesh extraction, simplification, smoothing, etc. We have concluded that the most realistic input to the system should be aligned, simplified meshes. It is up to the user to provide aligned meshes of adequate quality and reasonable complexity.

References

  • Fishbaugh, J., Prastawa, M., Durrleman, S., Piven, J., Gerig G. Analysis of Longitudinal Shape Variability via Subject Specific Growth Modeling. Proc. of Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention (MICCAI '12). (to appear),
  • Fishbaugh, J., Durrleman, S., Piven, J., Gerig, G. A Framework for Longitudinal Data Analysis via Shape Regression . SPIE Medical Imaging 2012: Image Processing. Vol. 8314.
  • Fishbaugh, J., Durrleman, S., Gerig, G. Estimation of Smooth Growth Trajectories with Controlled Acceleration from Time Series Shape Data. Proc. of Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention (MICCAI '11).