Difference between revisions of "2013 Project Week:Threaded SimpleITK Modules"

From NAMIC Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 32: Line 32:
 
<div style="width: 27%; float: left; padding-right: 3%;">
 
<div style="width: 27%; float: left; padding-right: 3%;">
 
<h3>Progress</h3>
 
<h3>Progress</h3>
* Progress here
+
* Able to patch SimpleITK to enable threading in all SimpleITK methods
 +
* Compiled patch into Slice and confirmed able to run ITK filters in background
 +
**https://github.com/blowekamp/Slicer/tree/EnableSimpleITKThreads
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
</div>

Revision as of 15:24, 11 January 2013

Home < 2013 Project Week:Threaded SimpleITK Modules

Key Investigators

  • Brad Lowekamp, NLM
  • Steve Pieper, Isomics

Project Description

For some filters and segmentation algorithms written using SimpleITK in slicer it would be nice to let them run in the background while letting slicer's main thread continue to process events. But the python byte code interpreter only allows a single path of python code to run at a time (see the discussion in the Preliminary Work section below). However since SimpleITK's implementation is in C++, it could release the GIL to allow the rest of the application to run while it processes. Care must be taken when processing progress events or modifying variables that are shared with the main thread.

Objective

  • Support multi-threaded execution of SimpleITK filters.
  • Try releasing the GIL when calling into SimpleITK
  • Look at what's required for synchronization and progress reporting

Approach, Plan

Progress

Preliminary Work

The example code below calls two different python functions from inside threads. One function calls the 'time.sleep' method, and one uses VTK to do some processing. As you can see from the output printed below, the VTK threads block, and a new thread is not started until the last one completes. On the other hand, the sleep based thread does return right away. The behavior is based on the CPython global interpreter lock. The topic was discussed in detail on the vtk developers list back in 2005.


import vtk
import threading
import Queue
import time, datetime
import os

class ThreadClass(threading.Thread):
  def __init__(self, queue, work):
    threading.Thread.__init__(self)
    self.queue = queue
    self.work = work
          
  def run(self):
    now = datetime.datetime.now()
    self.queue.put( "start %s, time: %s" % (self.getName(), now) )
    self.work()
    now = datetime.datetime.now()
    self.queue.put( "end %s, time: %s" % (self.getName(), now) )

def process():
  e = vtk.vtkImageEllipsoidSource()
  e.SetWholeExtent(0,300,0,300,0,300)
  s = vtk.vtkImageGaussianSmooth()
  s.SetInputConnection(e.GetOutputPort())
  s.Update()

def sleep():
  time.sleep(1)

for work,message in ((process,'vtk'), (sleep,'sleep')):
  print ('threading test with %s:' % message)
  threads = 3
  queue = Queue.Queue()
  for i in range(threads):
    t = ThreadClass(queue,work)
    t.start()
  print('started:')

  for i in range(2*threads):
    print(queue.get())
  print('finished\n')


#8 Slicer-superbuild $ ./VTK-build/bin/vtkpython /Users/pieper/Dropbox/hacks/threadVTK.py
threading test with vtk:
started:
start Thread-1, time: 2012-12-18 17:13:17.047282
end Thread-1, time: 2012-12-18 17:13:18.006989
start Thread-2, time: 2012-12-18 17:13:18.007318
end Thread-2, time: 2012-12-18 17:13:18.953446
start Thread-3, time: 2012-12-18 17:13:18.953762
end Thread-3, time: 2012-12-18 17:13:19.897673
finished

threading test with sleep:
started:
start Thread-4, time: 2012-12-18 17:13:19.898124
start Thread-5, time: 2012-12-18 17:13:19.898346
start Thread-6, time: 2012-12-18 17:13:19.898506
end Thread-4, time: 2012-12-18 17:13:20.899137
end Thread-6, time: 2012-12-18 17:13:20.899378
end Thread-5, time: 2012-12-18 17:13:20.899469
finished