Difference between revisions of "2014 Project Week:Registration Evaluation"

From NAMIC Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with '__NOTOC__ <gallery> Image:PW-SLC2014.png|Projects List </gallery> ==Key Investigators== Name, Institute ==Project Description== <div sty…')
 
Line 6: Line 6:
 
==Key Investigators==
 
==Key Investigators==
  
Name, Institute
+
Kevin Wang, Princess Margaret Cancer Center
  
 
==Project Description==
 
==Project Description==
Line 13: Line 13:
 
<div style="width: 27%; float: left; padding-right: 3%;">
 
<div style="width: 27%; float: left; padding-right: 3%;">
 
<h3>Objective</h3>
 
<h3>Objective</h3>
*  
+
* Currently the rigid registration in Slicer lacks the ability to interactively perform the registration. the project aims to develop some common set of features that are useful for across a wide range of workflow that will use rigid registration.
 +
* Common layout set up.
 +
* Common colortable set up.
 +
* Common user interaction for translation and rotation.
 +
* Common landmark based registration toolsets.
 +
* Common image based registration toolsets.
 +
 
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
<div style="width: 27%; float: left; padding-right: 3%;">
 
<div style="width: 27%; float: left; padding-right: 3%;">
 
<h3>Approach, Plan</h3>
 
<h3>Approach, Plan</h3>
*  
+
* Discuss with Steve and others on how to integrate the existing layout/colortable/landmark management in the landgmark registration module.
 +
* refactor the common set of features.
 +
* use the new common set of features in MRgRT workflow.
 +
 
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
<div style="width: 27%; float: left; padding-right: 3%;">
 
<div style="width: 27%; float: left; padding-right: 3%;">

Revision as of 19:42, 27 November 2013

Home < 2014 Project Week:Registration Evaluation

Key Investigators

Kevin Wang, Princess Margaret Cancer Center

Project Description

Objective

  • Currently the rigid registration in Slicer lacks the ability to interactively perform the registration. the project aims to develop some common set of features that are useful for across a wide range of workflow that will use rigid registration.
  • Common layout set up.
  • Common colortable set up.
  • Common user interaction for translation and rotation.
  • Common landmark based registration toolsets.
  • Common image based registration toolsets.

Approach, Plan

  • Discuss with Steve and others on how to integrate the existing layout/colortable/landmark management in the landgmark registration module.
  • refactor the common set of features.
  • use the new common set of features in MRgRT workflow.

Progress