Difference between revisions of "2015 BRAINSFit registration in SimpleITK"
From NAMIC Wiki
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
| − | + | {| | |
| − | Image: | + | | Case 9 |
| − | + | |[[Image:pat9-ref.png |thumb|300px|Reference intraop volume]] | |
| + | |[[Image:pat9-3_6.png|thumb|300px|Reg Result Slicer 3.6 with ITKv3]] | ||
| + | |[[Image:pat9-4_4.png|thumb|300px|Reg Result Slicer 4.4 with ITKv4]] | ||
| + | |} | ||
==Key Investigators== | ==Key Investigators== | ||
Revision as of 21:56, 4 June 2015
Home < 2015 BRAINSFit registration in SimpleITK| Case 9 |
Key Investigators
- Peter Behringer
- Andriy Fedorov
Project Description
Objective
- Our registration module for b-spline deformable registration of prostate MRI uses BRAINSFit in Slicer4/ITKv4.
- One issue that we are getting with ITKv4 is that there are a lot more irregular and unrealistic than what we used to get in ITKv3 (see summary here
- The Slicer4/ITKv4 registration tool should be comparable with the functionality we had in Slicer3/ITKv3, which was evaluated here
Approach, Plan
- Implement BRAINSFit functionality in SimpleITK
- Get ideas from the community how the irregularity can be avoided and implemented in SimpleITK
Progress
- Initialization and rigid registration is implemented using SimpleITK
