Difference between revisions of "2015 BRAINSFit registration in SimpleITK"

From NAMIC Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 18: Line 18:
 
* One issue that we are getting with ITKv4 is that there are a lot more irregular and unrealistic than what we used to get in ITKv3 (see summary [http://www.na-mic.org/Wiki/index.php/BRAINSFit_prostate_registration here]
 
* One issue that we are getting with ITKv4 is that there are a lot more irregular and unrealistic than what we used to get in ITKv3 (see summary [http://www.na-mic.org/Wiki/index.php/BRAINSFit_prostate_registration here]
 
* The Slicer4/ITKv4 registration tool should be comparable with the functionality we had in Slicer3/ITKv3, which was evaluated [http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jmri.23688/abstract;jsessionid=F9AADC56E72CA73A422B9C09728F7E81.f01t03 here]
 
* The Slicer4/ITKv4 registration tool should be comparable with the functionality we had in Slicer3/ITKv3, which was evaluated [http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jmri.23688/abstract;jsessionid=F9AADC56E72CA73A422B9C09728F7E81.f01t03 here]
*
 
  
 
</div>
 
</div>

Revision as of 21:57, 4 June 2015

Home < 2015 BRAINSFit registration in SimpleITK
Case 9
Reference intraop volume
Reg Result Slicer 3.6 with ITKv3
Reg Result Slicer 4.4 with ITKv4

Key Investigators

  • Peter Behringer
  • Andriy Fedorov

Project Description

Objective

  • Our registration module for b-spline deformable registration of prostate MRI uses BRAINSFit in Slicer4/ITKv4.
  • One issue that we are getting with ITKv4 is that there are a lot more irregular and unrealistic than what we used to get in ITKv3 (see summary here
  • The Slicer4/ITKv4 registration tool should be comparable with the functionality we had in Slicer3/ITKv3, which was evaluated here

Approach, Plan

  • Implement BRAINSFit functionality in SimpleITK
  • Get ideas from the community how the irregularity can be avoided and implemented in SimpleITK

Progress

  • Initialization and rigid registration is implemented using SimpleITK