Difference between revisions of "2015 Orthognathic Surgery"

From NAMIC Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 11: Line 11:
 
*Beatriz Paniagua, PhD, UNC Chapel Hill
 
*Beatriz Paniagua, PhD, UNC Chapel Hill
 
*Andinet Enquobahrie, PhD, Kitware
 
*Andinet Enquobahrie, PhD, Kitware
*Laura Sanz, UC3M, Madrid
 
  
 
==Collaborators==
 
==Collaborators==
 
*Andras Lasso, PhD, Queen's University
 
*Andras Lasso, PhD, Queen's University
 
*Tamas Ungi, PhD, Queen's University
 
*Tamas Ungi, PhD, Queen's University
 +
*Laura Sanz, UC3M, Madrid
  
 
==Project Description==
 
==Project Description==
Line 37: Line 37:
 
<div style="float: left">
 
<div style="float: left">
 
Project week goals are discussions for improvement of
 
Project week goals are discussions for improvement of
*3D reconstruction algorithm parameters
+
*3D reconstruction algorithm parameters (minor improvement)
*Ultrasound image post-processing
+
*Ultrasound image post-processing (no improvement)
*Scanning aspects related to repeatability
+
*Scanning aspects related to repeatability (important new information)
*Bone segmentation considerations
+
*Bone segmentation considerations (important new insights)
 
</div>
 
</div>

Latest revision as of 15:19, 24 June 2015

Home < 2015 Orthognathic Surgery

Key Investigators

  • Dženan Zukić, PhD, Kitware
  • Tung Nguyen, PhD, MD, UNC Chapel Hill
  • Ricardo Ortiz, PhD, Kitware
  • Beatriz Paniagua, PhD, UNC Chapel Hill
  • Andinet Enquobahrie, PhD, Kitware

Collaborators

  • Andras Lasso, PhD, Queen's University
  • Tamas Ungi, PhD, Queen's University
  • Laura Sanz, UC3M, Madrid

Project Description

Objective

  • Use ultrasound to verify proper position of mandibular condyle during orthognatic surgery

Approach, Plan

  • Use tracking to create 3D ultrasound image and register it with preop CT

Progress

  • Preliminary results available
  • Paper submitted to a MICCAI/AECAI2015 workshop.

Meeting goals

Project week goals are discussions for improvement of

  • 3D reconstruction algorithm parameters (minor improvement)
  • Ultrasound image post-processing (no improvement)
  • Scanning aspects related to repeatability (important new information)
  • Bone segmentation considerations (important new insights)