Difference between revisions of "2015 Summer Project Week:USRecon"

From NAMIC Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
 
Line 17: Line 17:
 
<div style="width: 27%; float: left; padding-right: 3%;">
 
<div style="width: 27%; float: left; padding-right: 3%;">
 
<h3>Objective</h3>
 
<h3>Objective</h3>
 +
* Evaluate resolution limits of ultrasound 3D reconstruction by comparing feature detection on a phantom.
 +
** Study effect of tracking variabilities and tracker/image synchronization on reconstruction accuracy
 +
** Consider what inherent limitations are imposed by the resolution of the US
 +
** Compare to gold standard uCT
 
* Integrate the TeleMed US scanner with PLUS and Slicer
 
* Integrate the TeleMed US scanner with PLUS and Slicer
 
</div>
 
</div>

Latest revision as of 14:45, 26 June 2015

Home < 2015 Summer Project Week:USRecon

Key Investigators

  • Steve Pieper
  • Tamas Ungi
  • Mikael Brudfords

Project Description

Objective

  • Evaluate resolution limits of ultrasound 3D reconstruction by comparing feature detection on a phantom.
    • Study effect of tracking variabilities and tracker/image synchronization on reconstruction accuracy
    • Consider what inherent limitations are imposed by the resolution of the US
    • Compare to gold standard uCT
  • Integrate the TeleMed US scanner with PLUS and Slicer

Approach, Plan

  • Hook up the tracked Ultrasound
  • Test with Elephantom
  • Compare with microCT gold standard

Progress

  • Used 3D printed tracker holder
  • Made several test scans
  • Experimented with limits of current implementation and inherent limitations of the probe
  • PLUS TeleMed through OpenIGTLink / SlicerIGT works great!