Difference between revisions of "2017 Winter Project Week/dcmqi"

From NAMIC Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "__NOTOC__ <gallery> Image:PW-Winter2017.png|link=2017_Winter_Project_Week#Projects|Projects List <!-- Use the "Upload file" link on the l...")
 
 
(12 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 12: Line 12:
 
* Steve Pieper, Isomics
 
* Steve Pieper, Isomics
 
* Jean-Christophe Fillion-Robin, Kitware
 
* Jean-Christophe Fillion-Robin, Kitware
 
+
* Andras Lasso, Queen's
 +
* Csaba Pinter, Queen's
 +
* Curt Lisle, KnowledgeVis, LLC
 +
* Teodora Szasz, University of Chicago
  
 
==Project Description==
 
==Project Description==
Line 23: Line 26:
 
<!-- Objective bullet points -->
 
<!-- Objective bullet points -->
 
* Introduce dcmqi to the community
 
* Introduce dcmqi to the community
 +
* improve documentation
 +
* discuss next steps and specific open issues
 
|
 
|
 
<!-- Approach and Plan bullet points -->
 
<!-- Approach and Plan bullet points -->
 
* Present, meet collaborators...
 
* Present, meet collaborators...
 +
* discuss pros and cons of integration as an external project into Slicer, and agree on the plan
 +
* discuss the process of integration of new segmentation contexts by the user
 +
* passing DICOM instances to the converters
 +
* support of units/quantities in Slicer (also see [https://www.slicer.org/wiki/Documentation/Labs/Units labs page])
 
|
 
|
 
<!-- Progress and Next steps bullet points (fill out at the end of project week -->
 
<!-- Progress and Next steps bullet points (fill out at the end of project week -->
*
+
* Discussions with the groups interested in exploring the use of DICOM for quantitative imaging research
 +
* Identified an alternative (improved, hopefully) approach for communicating measurements to the SR converter using CSV: CSV table for the measurement quantities + CSV or JSON for describing the column names
 +
* Discussed harmonization of the existing Units support in Slicer, and support of quantities/units for scalar volumes (only, for now); agreed that for now it makes sense to communicate per-volume quantity/units as MRML node attributes
 
|}
 
|}
  
 
==Background and References==
 
==Background and References==
 
* dcmqi home page: http://github.com/qiicr/dcmqi
 
* dcmqi home page: http://github.com/qiicr/dcmqi
 +
* dcmqi Slicer extension: https://www.slicer.org/wiki/Documentation/Nightly/Extensions/DCMQI
 
* DICOM4QI at RSNA2016: https://fedorov.gitbooks.io/rsna2016-qirr-dicom4qi/content/
 
* DICOM4QI at RSNA2016: https://fedorov.gitbooks.io/rsna2016-qirr-dicom4qi/content/
 +
* https://peerj.com/articles/2057/

Latest revision as of 15:58, 13 January 2017

Home < 2017 Winter Project Week < dcmqi

Key Investigators

  • Andrey Fedorov, BWH
  • Christian Herz, BWH
  • Steve Pieper, Isomics
  • Jean-Christophe Fillion-Robin, Kitware
  • Andras Lasso, Queen's
  • Csaba Pinter, Queen's
  • Curt Lisle, KnowledgeVis, LLC
  • Teodora Szasz, University of Chicago

Project Description

Objective Approach and Plan Progress and Next Steps
  • Introduce dcmqi to the community
  • improve documentation
  • discuss next steps and specific open issues
  • Present, meet collaborators...
  • discuss pros and cons of integration as an external project into Slicer, and agree on the plan
  • discuss the process of integration of new segmentation contexts by the user
  • passing DICOM instances to the converters
  • support of units/quantities in Slicer (also see labs page)
  • Discussions with the groups interested in exploring the use of DICOM for quantitative imaging research
  • Identified an alternative (improved, hopefully) approach for communicating measurements to the SR converter using CSV: CSV table for the measurement quantities + CSV or JSON for describing the column names
  • Discussed harmonization of the existing Units support in Slicer, and support of quantities/units for scalar volumes (only, for now); agreed that for now it makes sense to communicate per-volume quantity/units as MRML node attributes

Background and References