Difference between revisions of "4D DTI tractography in Slicer for TBI"
From NAMIC Wiki
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
<h3>Progress</h3> | <h3>Progress</h3> | ||
| − | * using Slicer registration modules to do coregistration. | + | * using Slicer registration modules to do coregistration between structural and diffusion MRI. |
** tried affine, Bspline, demons registration modules. | ** tried affine, Bspline, demons registration modules. | ||
* worked with Andrei and Anuja together to solve the problem of loading DICOM images. | * worked with Andrei and Anuja together to solve the problem of loading DICOM images. | ||
| − | * discussed with Andrei and Micah about recent progress. | + | * discussed with Andrei and Micah about recent progress and future plan. |
* attended the TBI DBP Team Meeting. | * attended the TBI DBP Team Meeting. | ||
| + | |||
</div> | </div> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Revision as of 09:22, 11 January 2013
Home < 4D DTI tractography in Slicer for TBI
T2 image of one subject
DWI image of the same subject
Key Investigators
Bo Wang, Andrei Irimia, Micah Chambers, Jack Van Horn, Marcel Prastawa, Guido Gerig
Objective
- Combining structural and DTI information for assessment of recovery and treatment efficacy for TBI.
- Coregistration of structural and DTI data of TBI.
- Applying 4D model to DTI data to investigate the changes between acute and chronic time points.
Approach, Plan
- Register DTI to structural images.
- Apply deformation between acute and chronic time points to the co-registered DTI images
- Evaluate initial result with our collaborators
Progress
- using Slicer registration modules to do coregistration between structural and diffusion MRI.
- tried affine, Bspline, demons registration modules.
- worked with Andrei and Anuja together to solve the problem of loading DICOM images.
- discussed with Andrei and Micah about recent progress and future plan.
- attended the TBI DBP Team Meeting.
