Difference between revisions of "CTSC:ARRA.062910"

From NAMIC Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 30: Line 30:
 
== Meeting Minutes ==
 
== Meeting Minutes ==
  
* Update:
+
* Update
 
** The team finished the development of the phase 2 software. It will be installed over the phase 1 software. Tests will continue this week and installation will happen the 2nd week of July. The new version moves one image at a time. MGH will be the 1st site for installation, it has Santa with all the different imaging facilities (CT, MRI, US, Nuc med). Santa has phantoms and a couple of test patients.
 
** The team finished the development of the phase 2 software. It will be installed over the phase 1 software. Tests will continue this week and installation will happen the 2nd week of July. The new version moves one image at a time. MGH will be the 1st site for installation, it has Santa with all the different imaging facilities (CT, MRI, US, Nuc med). Santa has phantoms and a couple of test patients.
  
Line 39: Line 39:
 
* STAR-D workflow analysis
 
* STAR-D workflow analysis
 
** Wendy and Cynthia have been working hard on the workflow analysis. For images only, not report, to get report, one would go to the RIS.
 
** Wendy and Cynthia have been working hard on the workflow analysis. For images only, not report, to get report, one would go to the RIS.
** Goals: be user-friendly
 
 
** 3 intuitive steps: step 1: site selection and finding patients, step 2: finding studies and destination selection, step 3: transfer status and view.
 
** 3 intuitive steps: step 1: site selection and finding patients, step 2: finding studies and destination selection, step 3: transfer status and view.
 
** 3 typical paths: 1. Serial top-to-bottom. Change to another site and repeat or log out. 2. Iteratively build up.
 
** 3 typical paths: 1. Serial top-to-bottom. Change to another site and repeat or log out. 2. Iteratively build up.
 
** what can user save? They can save images. If someone wants to save a patient set, you can get scout list and delete what you don't want. Is is better to save search terms or search results? Here we start with the result, people will enter the accession numbers by hand.  
 
** what can user save? They can save images. If someone wants to save a patient set, you can get scout list and delete what you don't want. Is is better to save search terms or search results? Here we start with the result, people will enter the accession numbers by hand.  
At MGH, several PACS systems so even internally we might want to connect several PACS
+
** Filtering: what is filer-able? view found results, can choose/modify a patient set. For example, push a gender at the top of the list.
 +
** Parallel uxp for STAR-D systems: with or without i2b2, from the user point of view.
 +
** Embedded concepts
 +
** Reentrant behavior, what is persistent?
 +
 
 +
* Next meeting
 +
Continue working on the STAR-D workflow analysis.

Revision as of 15:31, 29 June 2010

Home < CTSC:ARRA.062910

Back to CTSC:ARRA supplement

Agenda

  • Update from CHildren's hospital
  • Presentation of mi2b2 project at ACRIN meeting
  • uxp and UI design: workflow analysis


Harvard Catalyst Medical Informatics group Meeting Minutes June 29, 2010

In attendance:

  • Valerie Humblet
  • Bill Wang
  • Wendy Plesniak
  • Bill Tellier
  • Chris Herrick
  • Darren Sack
  • Shawn Murphy
  • Cynthia Lee
  • Charles Mc Govern
  • Jesse Wei
  • Mark Anderson (phone)
  • Alex Zeitsev (phone)
  • Karl Helmer (by phone)


Meeting Minutes

  • Update
    • The team finished the development of the phase 2 software. It will be installed over the phase 1 software. Tests will continue this week and installation will happen the 2nd week of July. The new version moves one image at a time. MGH will be the 1st site for installation, it has Santa with all the different imaging facilities (CT, MRI, US, Nuc med). Santa has phantoms and a couple of test patients.
  • Presentation of mi2b2 project at ACRIN meeting
    • The team identified the ACRIN meeting as an excellent venue to introduce the project to a larger audience. There will be a session of the CTSA IWG on September 29 when we can present. Chris and Dan Marcus will do the presentation.
    • There is a t-con of the IWG Steering Committee scheduled for July 19, Randy would like to have a slide deck and a blur (goals, intro) to send to Dan Sullivan before the call.
  • STAR-D workflow analysis
    • Wendy and Cynthia have been working hard on the workflow analysis. For images only, not report, to get report, one would go to the RIS.
    • 3 intuitive steps: step 1: site selection and finding patients, step 2: finding studies and destination selection, step 3: transfer status and view.
    • 3 typical paths: 1. Serial top-to-bottom. Change to another site and repeat or log out. 2. Iteratively build up.
    • what can user save? They can save images. If someone wants to save a patient set, you can get scout list and delete what you don't want. Is is better to save search terms or search results? Here we start with the result, people will enter the accession numbers by hand.
    • Filtering: what is filer-able? view found results, can choose/modify a patient set. For example, push a gender at the top of the list.
    • Parallel uxp for STAR-D systems: with or without i2b2, from the user point of view.
    • Embedded concepts
    • Reentrant behavior, what is persistent?
  • Next meeting

Continue working on the STAR-D workflow analysis.