Difference between revisions of "DBP3:Utah"

From NAMIC Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 49: Line 49:
 
***Test and Evaluate Behnood's wall segmentation: Results and analysis are here -> [[DBP3:Utah:AutoWallSeg|Automatic Wall Segmentation]]
 
***Test and Evaluate Behnood's wall segmentation: Results and analysis are here -> [[DBP3:Utah:AutoWallSeg|Automatic Wall Segmentation]]
 
** ONGOING
 
** ONGOING
*** Test and Evaluate Yi Gao's atlas-based endocardial segmentation algorithm
+
*** Test and Evaluate Yi Gao's atlas-based endocardial segmentation algorithm -> [[DBP3:Utah:AutoEndoSeg|Automatic Endocardial Segmentation]]
 
* CARMA team learning/testing of Slicer tools
 
* CARMA team learning/testing of Slicer tools
 
** ONGOING
 
** ONGOING

Revision as of 20:42, 8 November 2011

Home < DBP3:Utah
Back to NA-MIC DBPs | NA-MIC Cores


The CARMA DBP: MRI-based study and treatment of atrial fibrillation

Tissue remodeling of the atrial wall is the hallmark of Atrial Fibrillation (AF), a progressive cardiac disease that develops over time (months to years). The mechanisms of of this transformation are only partially understood, but the current scientific focus on tissue remodeling and its putative role in AF suggests an MRI image-based approach to the study of AF.

The Comprehensive Arrhythmia Research and MAnagement (CARMA) Center at the University of Utah is a world leader in the rapidly emerging field of MRI-managed evaluation and ablation of AF. Other groups have begun to recognize the potential of this approach and to investigate and validate some of our findings. Still others are developing new refinements of the MRI technique driven by the specific needs of this application domain.

Preliminary investigation by CARMA has identified image processing and analysis as the rate-limiting step to the development of MRI-based therapies. Novel forms of MRI can be used to evaluate new patients, predict success before ablation, analyze outcomes post-ablation, and guide repeat ablations. Such MRI-based therapies, however, urgently require advanced tools and software to support efficient workflows and accelerate the quantification and analysis of images. The CARMA-NAMIC DBP project will address some of these needs with the development of algorithms and tools for the automated segmentation of heart structures and the MRI-based evaluation of AF progression and recovery.

This remainder of this wiki page describes ongoing CARMA-NAMIC activities and specific plans. For more background information, references, and description of the specific scientific and clinical aims of this project, please see the project web page: http://www.na-mic.org/pages/DBP:Atrial_Fibrillation .


DBP Specific Aims

  • Develop and validate image-based longitudinal diagnostic indices for AF
  • Develop automatic segmentation methods for the atrium and adjacent structures
  • Develop an AF scoring scheme to evaluate disease progression and recovery from therapy

The CARMA Center's Utah classification for Atrial Fibrillation staging involves segmentation of the left atrial wall from MRI, followed by quantification of enhanced vs. non-enhanced voxels in the wall.

(IMAGE ABOVE) The CARMA Center's Utah classification for Atrial Fibrillation staging involves segmentation of the left atrial wall from MRI, followed by quantification of enhanced vs. non-enhanced voxels in the wall.


Activites

  • Technical collaboration with GA Tech
  • CARMA team learning/testing of Slicer tools
  • CARMA Public Longitudinal AFIB DE-MRI data
    • COMPLETED
      • Assemble dataset
      • Obtain IRB for public release
    • ONGOING
      • Awaiting community and login information for Kitware MIDAS instance
  • Slicer Module Development (by CARMA personnel)
    • ONGOING
      • Module: Rigid -> Affine (-> Deformable) general LGE-MRI registration: [1]

Engineering Wishlist

  • Some extend support for DICOM I/O (ITK V.4 may take care of this)
  • Tools for deformable image registration (example applications exist in both clinical image management and in experiments) .)
  • Tools for image registration, in general, is a big need that we have. Again, examples exist for both clinical and experimental data.
  • GUI support for "steerable" segmentation methods like level-set methods, active contours, etc. (e.g. GA Tech's work on left atrium segmentation).
    • Workflow
    • Interaction widgets
      • Placing fudicials, guides, constraints, walls, sources, sinks, etc.
  • "Show me a histogram, let me pick a range from the histogram" and provide means for histogram processing to suggest thresholds.

Sample Data