Difference between revisions of "DBP 2010"

From NAMIC Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 12: Line 12:
 
The DBP's for the 2010 round will be solicited by Ron Kikinis in consultation with the core 1 and core 2 PI's. The will participate in the development and implementation of the competitive renewal. Specifics of this process will be determined after the RFA has been released.
 
The DBP's for the 2010 round will be solicited by Ron Kikinis in consultation with the core 1 and core 2 PI's. The will participate in the development and implementation of the competitive renewal. Specifics of this process will be determined after the RFA has been released.
  
= First Round of Selection process: Solicitation =
+
= Steps =
  
== Prerequisites ==
+
== Prerequisites for candidate groups==
  
 
* Candidates have to have existing NIH funding as PI or co-investigator
 
* Candidates have to have existing NIH funding as PI or co-investigator
 
* Joint publications with at least one Core 1 or Core 2 member.
 
* Joint publications with at least one Core 1 or Core 2 member.
* Willingness to adopt the NA-MIC kit
+
* Willingness to fully adopt the NA-MIC kit
* Willingness to use DBP funds to hire at least one computer science person into the DBP to help adoption of the NA-MIC kit by the DBP group
+
* NA-MIC funds are NOT to be used for data acquisition
 +
* Willingness to use DBP funds to hire a software engineer to help  
 +
** adoption of the NA-MIC kit by the DBP group and
 +
** customization of Na-mic software towards the needs of the DBP.
  
== Spring 2009: First stage proposal ==
+
== Spring 2009: First stage ==
  
 
We intend to minimize the effort for both the candidates and the decision makers. For your convenience, you can refer potential DBP candidates to our short [[Media:Na-mic-overview.doc|NA-MIC overview]]. We are looking for a short text that addresses the following points:
 
We intend to minimize the effort for both the candidates and the decision makers. For your convenience, you can refer potential DBP candidates to our short [[Media:Na-mic-overview.doc|NA-MIC overview]]. We are looking for a short text that addresses the following points:

Revision as of 13:31, 12 September 2008

Home < DBP 2010

Back to DBP changeover main page

Selection Process

Motivations and Procedure


The original RFA specified the following:

  • In core 3, an investigator will propose 2-4 collaborations with NIH funded biomedical or behavioral researchers to address a biomedical/behavioral question using computational approaches. It is not essential that the biomedical researchers have expertise in computational biology, but they should have a question that will drive the fundamental computational research in cores 1 and 2. The purpose of this core is to ensure that the research carried out in cores 1 and 2 has direct relevance to biomedical or behavioral research. It may be useful for these Driving Biological Projects (DPB's) to have a focus on a particular disease or organ, but that sort of focus might not be appropriate for all NIH NCBCs. It is expected that many of the biomedical researchers in core 3 will not be at the same institution as the parent NIH NCBC. In such cases, convincing plans for collaboration at a distance must be presented in the proposal.


The DBP's for the 2010 round will be solicited by Ron Kikinis in consultation with the core 1 and core 2 PI's. The will participate in the development and implementation of the competitive renewal. Specifics of this process will be determined after the RFA has been released.

Steps

Prerequisites for candidate groups

  • Candidates have to have existing NIH funding as PI or co-investigator
  • Joint publications with at least one Core 1 or Core 2 member.
  • Willingness to fully adopt the NA-MIC kit
  • NA-MIC funds are NOT to be used for data acquisition
  • Willingness to use DBP funds to hire a software engineer to help
    • adoption of the NA-MIC kit by the DBP group and
    • customization of Na-mic software towards the needs of the DBP.

Spring 2009: First stage

We intend to minimize the effort for both the candidates and the decision makers. For your convenience, you can refer potential DBP candidates to our short NA-MIC overview. We are looking for a short text that addresses the following points:

  • Abstract from the qualifying NIH grant (or comparable short description of the driving project), grant # and program officer
  • What is the history with the core 1 or core 2 "sponsor" (1 paragraph)
  • What is the benefit to the DBP applicant (1 paragraph)
  • What is the benefit to NA-MIC (1 paragraph)