Difference between revisions of "Projects:MGH-HeadAndNeck-RT"

From NAMIC Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 5: Line 5:
 
==Segmentation Algorithm ==
 
==Segmentation Algorithm ==
  
Initial se
+
Initial experiments show that bony structures such as the mandible can be segmented accurately with a graph cut based algorithm. However, for soft tissue such as the brain stem, the intensity profile does not contain sufficient information for reasonably accurate segmentation. To deal with "soft boundaries" shape priors are necessary. They will be included in the follwing manner. First, a structure we are confident in will be segmented. Using probabilistic PCA a metric used to describe how likely the structure whose segmentation we have obtained is; this metric is essentially a description of how confident we are in the correct segmentation. Then, the location of this structure will be used as prior information(it becomes a landmark) to segment a more difficult structure. Iteratively, the nth structure to be segmented will have n-1 priors do draw information from with a confidence metric for each prior. The likely location of the nth structure, calculated as described above, will serve as an input to a graph cut algorithm, which will perform the optimization, in the form of a distance function. This distance function regulates how easy or difficult it is to cut links between neighbors(in other words, where the segmentation boundary will be drawn).
  
 
== Current State of Work ==
 
== Current State of Work ==
  
Future work on this method will include coupling the evolution of the interior and exterior surfaces so that information about local intensities and geometries can be shared in order to detect plaques more robustly. Furthermore, a larger study is planned in which a larger number of datasets will be analyzed, a quantitative analysis will be performed, and the method will be compared with intravascular ultrasound imagery to confirm the presence and composition of detected plaques. We believe this work has the potential of being an important step forward in automatically detecting non-calcified plaques, which have been clearly linked with the occurrence of heart attacks and stroke.
+
Currently, we are collecting patient scan with physician drawn labelmaps to build the model for shape analysis. In parallel, synthetic data is being used to develop/test the algorithm used to calculate the likelihood metric and the likely location of a structure given previously segmeted structures. The graph cut implementation is read to accept the unsigned distance map as prior information.
  
 
== Publications ==
 
== Publications ==

Revision as of 20:06, 1 October 2009

Home < Projects:MGH-HeadAndNeck-RT

Problem Description

Proton therapy is used to deliver accurate doses of radiation to people undergoing cancer treatment. At the beginning of treatment, a personalized plan describing the amount of radiation and location to which it must be delivered is created for the patient. However, over the course of the treatment, which lasts weeks, a person's anatomy is likely to change. Adaptive radiotherapy aims to improve fractionated radiotherapy by re-optimizing the radiation treatment plan for each session. To update the plan, the CT images acquired during a treatment session are registered to the treatment plan and doses of radiation to be delivered are re-calculated accordingly. A correct segmentation is a pre-requisite for this dose re-optimization and is the starting point for this project.

Segmentation Algorithm

Initial experiments show that bony structures such as the mandible can be segmented accurately with a graph cut based algorithm. However, for soft tissue such as the brain stem, the intensity profile does not contain sufficient information for reasonably accurate segmentation. To deal with "soft boundaries" shape priors are necessary. They will be included in the follwing manner. First, a structure we are confident in will be segmented. Using probabilistic PCA a metric used to describe how likely the structure whose segmentation we have obtained is; this metric is essentially a description of how confident we are in the correct segmentation. Then, the location of this structure will be used as prior information(it becomes a landmark) to segment a more difficult structure. Iteratively, the nth structure to be segmented will have n-1 priors do draw information from with a confidence metric for each prior. The likely location of the nth structure, calculated as described above, will serve as an input to a graph cut algorithm, which will perform the optimization, in the form of a distance function. This distance function regulates how easy or difficult it is to cut links between neighbors(in other words, where the segmentation boundary will be drawn).

Current State of Work

Currently, we are collecting patient scan with physician drawn labelmaps to build the model for shape analysis. In parallel, synthetic data is being used to develop/test the algorithm used to calculate the likelihood metric and the likely location of a structure given previously segmeted structures. The graph cut implementation is read to accept the unsigned distance map as prior information.

Publications

Abstract sumbitted for publication in SPIE Medical Imaging 2010

Key Investigators

Georgia Tech: Ivan Kolesov, Vandana Mohan, and Allen Tannenbaum Massachusetts General Hospital: Gregory Sharp