Projects:RegistrationLibrary:RegLib C01

From NAMIC Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Home < Projects:RegistrationLibrary:RegLib C01

Back to ARRA main page
Back to Registration main page
Back to Registration Use-case Inventory

Slicer Registration Use Case Exampe #2: Inter-subject Brain MRI: axial T1 Tumor Growth AssessmentI

this is the fixed reference image. All images are aligned into this space lleft this is the moving image. The transform is calculated by matching this to the reference image LEGEND

lleft this indicates the reference image that is fixed and does not move. All other images are aligned into this space and resolution
lleft this indicates the moving image that determines the registration transform.

lleft T1 SPGR lleft T2 FLAIR
0.9375 x 0.9375 x 1.4 mm
256 x 256 x 112
RAS
0.9375 x 0.9375 x 1.2 mm
256 x 256 x 130
RAS

Objective / Background

This is a classic case of change assessment. We want to know if the tumor changed since last exam.

Keywords

MRI, brain, head, intra-subject, T1, tumor growth, meningioma, change assessment

Input Data

  • Button red fixed white.jpgreference/fixed : T1 SPGR , 0.9375 x 0.9375 x 1.4 mm voxel size, axial, RAS orientation.
  • Button green moving white.jpg moving: T1 SPGR , 0.9375 x 0.9375 x 1.2 mm voxel size, sagittal, RAS orientation.
  • Content preview: Have a quick look before downloading: Does your data look like this? Media:RegUC2_lightbox.png
  • download dataset to load into slicer (~17 MB zip archive)

Registration Challenges

  • accuracy is the critical criterion here. We need the registration error (residual misalignment) to be smaller than the change we want to measure.
  • we have slightly different voxel sizes
  • if the pathology change is substantial it might affect the registration.
  • the different series may have different FOV.
  • the different series may have different resolution / voxel sizes.

Key Strategies

  • the SPGR is the anatomical reference. It is also higher resolution. Unless there are overriding reasons, always use the highest resolution image as your fixed/reference.
  • the defacing of the SPGR image introduces sharp edges that can be detrimental. Best to mask that area. If you have the mask available, use it. But in this case since we already have a skull-stripping mask as part of the labelmap, that is even better. We will load the labelmap and use it as mask in finding the registration
  • because the two images are still reasonably similar in contrast, we can choose an intensity ratio as cost function, which is less stable but if successful provides a more precise alignment than mutual information.

Procedures

Registration Results