Projects:RegistrationLibrary:RegLib C02

From NAMIC Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Home < Projects:RegistrationLibrary:RegLib C02

Back to ARRA main page
Back to Registration main page
Back to Registration Use-case Inventory

Slicer Registration Use Case Exampe: Intra-subject Brain MR FLAIR to MR T1

this is the fixed reference image. All images are aligned into this space lleft this is the moving image. The transform is calculated by matching this to the reference image this is a passive image to which the calculated transform is applied. It is a label-map in the same space as the moving FLAIR image LEGEND

lleft this indicates the reference image that is fixed and does not move. All other images are aligned into this space and resolution
lleft this indicates the moving image that determines the registration transform.
lleft this indicates images that passively move into the reference space, i.e. they have the transform applied but do not contribute to the calculation of the transform.

lleft T1 SPGR lleft T2 FLAIR lleft LABEL-MAP
1mm isotropic
256 x 256 x 146
RAS
1.2mm isotropic
256 x 256 x 116
RAS
1.2mm isotropic
256 x 256 x 116
RAS

Objective / Background

This scenario occurs in many forms whenever we wish to align all the series from a single MRI exam/session into a common space. Alignment is necessary because the subject likely has moved in between series.

Keywords

MRI, brain, head, intra-subject, FLAIR, T1, defacing, masking, labelmap, segmentation

Input Data

  • Button red fixed white.jpgreference/fixed : T1 SPGR , 1x1x1 mm voxel size, sagittal, RAS orientation.
  • Button green moving white.jpg moving: T2 FLAIR 1.2x1.2x1.2 mm voxel size, sagittal, RAS orientation.
  • Button blue tag white.jpgtag: segmentation labelmap obtained from FLAIR.
  • Content preview: Have a quick look before downloading: Does your data look like this? SPGR Lighbox , FLAIR Lighbox
  • download dataset to load into slicer (~17 MB zip archive)

Registration Challenges

  • the amount of misalignment to be small. Subject did not leave the scanner in between the two acquisitions, but we have some head movement.
  • we know the underlying structure/anatomy did not change, but the two distinct acquisition types may contain different amounts of distortion
  • the T1 high-resolution had a "defacing" applied, i.e. part of the image containing facial features was removed to ensure anonymity. The FLAIR is lower resolution and contrast and did not need this. The sharp edges and missing information in part of the image may cause problems.
  • we have a skull stripping label map of the fixed image (T1) that we can use to mask out the non-brain part of the image and prevent it from actively participating in the registration.
  • we have one or more label-maps attached to the moving image that we also want to align.
  • the different series have different dimensions, voxel size and field of view. Hence the choice of which image to choose as the reference becomes important. The additional image data present in one image but not the other may distract the algorithm and require masking.
  • hi-resolution datasets may have defacing applied to one or both sets, and the defacing-masks may not be available
  • the different series have different contrast. The T1 contains good contrast between white (WM) and gray matter (GM) , and pathology appears as hypointense. The FLAIR on the other hand shows barely any WM/GM contrast and the pathology appears very dominantly as hyperintense.

Key Strategies

  • the SPGR is the anatomical reference. It is also higher resolution. Unless there are overriding reasons, always use the highest resolution image as your fixed/reference.
  • the defacing of the SPGR image introduces sharp edges that can be detrimental. Best to mask that area. If you have the mask available, use it. But in this case since we already have a skull-stripping mask as part of the labelmap, that is even better. We will load the labelmap and use it as mask in finding the registration
  • because the two images are still reasonably similar in contrast, we can choose an intensity ratio as cost function, which is less stable but if successful provides a more precise alignment than mutual information.

Procedures

Registration Results