Difference between revisions of "CTSC:TTIC.031610"
From NAMIC Wiki
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
# Education program | # Education program | ||
# Harvard Catalyst retreat (feedback from Randy) | # Harvard Catalyst retreat (feedback from Randy) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Harvard Translational Imaging Consortium Meeting Minutes March 16, 2010 == | ||
| + | |||
| + | In attendance: | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Valerie Humblet | ||
| + | * Randy Gollub | ||
| + | * Laura Alice | ||
| + | * Wendy Plesniak | ||
| + | * Gordon Harris | ||
| + | * Charles Guttmann | ||
| + | * Bill Hanlon | ||
| + | * Clare Tempany | ||
| + | * Bob Lenkinsky | ||
| + | * Simon Warfield | ||
| + | * Gordon Williams | ||
| + | * Neil Rofsky | ||
| + | |||
| + | <br> | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''1. Consultations''' <br> | ||
| + | |||
| + | * All the consultations have been assigned, all updated in JIRA. | ||
| + | |||
| + | <br> | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''2. Education program''' <br> | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Neuroimaging: | ||
| + | ** Randy updated the speaker list. | ||
| + | ** As for the other sessions, the talks will target people interested more in the discipline than the physics of the technique. | ||
| + | * General: | ||
| + | ** Important to highlight health protected data in the life cycle of medical imaging talks. | ||
| + | ** The talks can be uploaded on the SPL secure website, Valerie will communicate the url and the username and password. | ||
| + | |||
| + | <br> | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''3. Harvard Catalyst retreat''' | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Translational PIs are the main target of Harvard Catalyst. | ||
| + | * During the retreat, participant were asked to view Harvard Catalyst from the point of view of the PIs, the division chiefs, the CEO, the President etc. | ||
| + | * People do not believe that Harvard Catalyst reaches a broad enough group, very often people don't know about the resources. | ||
| + | * Any program that has money attached to it (KL2, pilot grant, PCIR lab support) gets a better impact. | ||
| + | ** This means that having a budget to pay for scan would be a very good thing because so far we advertise the resources but we don't have the budget to let PIs used them. | ||
| + | ** Bob suggested to be more pro-active and pick a couple of projects that are multi-institutional, support them and then show our accomplishment. Bob agreed to lead a subcommittee that would meet offline and then report to the group. | ||
Latest revision as of 02:04, 23 March 2010
Home < CTSC:TTIC.031610Back to Collaboration:Harvard_CTSC
Agenda
- Consultations: update on on-going consultations
- Education program
- Harvard Catalyst retreat (feedback from Randy)
Harvard Translational Imaging Consortium Meeting Minutes March 16, 2010
In attendance:
- Valerie Humblet
- Randy Gollub
- Laura Alice
- Wendy Plesniak
- Gordon Harris
- Charles Guttmann
- Bill Hanlon
- Clare Tempany
- Bob Lenkinsky
- Simon Warfield
- Gordon Williams
- Neil Rofsky
1. Consultations
- All the consultations have been assigned, all updated in JIRA.
2. Education program
- Neuroimaging:
- Randy updated the speaker list.
- As for the other sessions, the talks will target people interested more in the discipline than the physics of the technique.
- General:
- Important to highlight health protected data in the life cycle of medical imaging talks.
- The talks can be uploaded on the SPL secure website, Valerie will communicate the url and the username and password.
3. Harvard Catalyst retreat
- Translational PIs are the main target of Harvard Catalyst.
- During the retreat, participant were asked to view Harvard Catalyst from the point of view of the PIs, the division chiefs, the CEO, the President etc.
- People do not believe that Harvard Catalyst reaches a broad enough group, very often people don't know about the resources.
- Any program that has money attached to it (KL2, pilot grant, PCIR lab support) gets a better impact.
- This means that having a budget to pay for scan would be a very good thing because so far we advertise the resources but we don't have the budget to let PIs used them.
- Bob suggested to be more pro-active and pick a couple of projects that are multi-institutional, support them and then show our accomplishment. Bob agreed to lead a subcommittee that would meet offline and then report to the group.
