Difference between revisions of "2009 Winter Project Week:LesionAlgorithms"

From NAMIC Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 8: Line 8:
  
 
===Key Investigators===
 
===Key Investigators===
Marcel, Vince, Ross, Jeremy
+
Mark, Marcel, Vince, Ross, Jeremy
  
 
<div style="margin: 20px;">
 
<div style="margin: 20px;">
Line 15: Line 15:
  
 
<h1>Objective</h1>
 
<h1>Objective</h1>
We have tested several algorithms and approaches for classifying white matter lesions.
+
We have tested several algorithms and approaches for classifying white matter lesions.<br>
There are also other methods within the NA-MIC kit and approaches that are being developed to be used within Slicer.
+
There are also other methods within the NA-MIC kit and and external approach that is being developed to be used within Slicer (WMLS).<br>
Currently for our end to end tutorial, we have implemented a novel algorithm.
+
Currently for our end to end tutorial, we have implemented a novel algorithm because the generalizability of our previous method to the clinical sample was poor.<br>
  
  

Revision as of 18:50, 5 January 2009

Home < 2009 Winter Project Week:LesionAlgorithms



Key Investigators

Mark, Marcel, Vince, Ross, Jeremy

Objective

We have tested several algorithms and approaches for classifying white matter lesions.
There are also other methods within the NA-MIC kit and and external approach that is being developed to be used within Slicer (WMLS).
Currently for our end to end tutorial, we have implemented a novel algorithm because the generalizability of our previous method to the clinical sample was poor.


Approach, Plan

Review comparisons of NA-MIC kit tools EM-Segment, Prastawa Method, Magnotta Method, a new method a UPenn, etc
what is the best approach to use for the roadmap project?
What if anything can be leveraged or combined into a universal method?
This work should lead towards planned MICCAI (march 8 due date) or other venue paper on white matter lesion also plan on immediately after full application/analysis of a clinical lupus sample (n=62).

Progress


References