Difference between revisions of "CTSC:TTIC.051909"

From NAMIC Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 41: Line 41:
 
<br>
 
<br>
  
'''3. Educational program: CME accreditation''' <br>
+
'''3. Educational program: CME accreditation''' <br>
  
 
* Jeff gather some informations on how to get CME accreditation for some courses of our educational program. Getting CME credit for a course makes it very attractive for people to attend
 
* Jeff gather some informations on how to get CME accreditation for some courses of our educational program. Getting CME credit for a course makes it very attractive for people to attend

Revision as of 20:05, 19 May 2009

Home < CTSC:TTIC.051909

Back to Collaboration:Harvard_CTSC
Agenda

  1. Consultation update
  2. PCIR reviews
  3. Educational program: CME accreditation
  4. Increase visibility of the consulting service
  5. June 9 mini-retreat


Harvard Translational Imaging Consortium Meeting Minutes May 19, 2009

In attendance:

  • Randy Gollub
  • Valerie Humblet
  • Clare Tempany
  • Simon Warfield
  • Yong Gao
  • Charles Guttmann
  • Bruce Rosen
  • Gordon Williams
  • Jeff Yap


1. Update on imaging consultation requests

  • This week there was no new consultation request submitted through the Catalyst website.
  • Randy and Gordon reminded all the members to submitted all the imaging consultation they are doing, Valerie will collect them.


2. PCIR reviews

  • All the members of the consortium are requested to review the applications for new protocols involving imaging submitted through the PCIR of the different institutions. Catalyst Central sent a letter explaining what is expected from the members involved in the reviewing process. The consortium members who did not received the letter by the end of the week should contact Valerie or Randy.
    • The consortium agreed that all the applications for new protocols should be send to Valerie who will redistribute them. She will make sure to get a good distribution among the team.
    • The response to these application must be quick. The launching of JIRA in July will facilitate the follow-up.
  • The support provided to investigators using imaging resources at the PCIR needs to be capture as work the group does in the context of the Catalyst. It maps nicely (as well as the image data analysis at BWH) to the evaluation plan. It is critical to be able to count for all the work the consortium does. On the same subject, Clare noticed that the consortium members will be asked to review the pilot grant applications. Randy and Valerie will ask Catalyst Central how the members can get credit for it as part of the work they do for the CTSC.


3. Educational program: CME accreditation

  • Jeff gather some informations on how to get CME accreditation for some courses of our educational program. Getting CME credit for a course makes it very attractive for people to attend
    • There is a annually review process due in June. Valerie and Jeff will contact Michelle Wright at Catalyst Central to see what support they have in place.
    • The safety courses (dosimetry, contrast agents, etc) would be a good target for CME accreditation. The imaging technologists are very interested because those risk management credits are hard to find. Randy suggested that we could offer a training every 2 months at the different institutions.
    • Clare and Randy reminded the group that getting CME accreditation takes a lot of work and that every lecture needs to be monitor. Again, the administrative support from Catalyst Central will be key.


4. Increase visibility of the consulting service

  • Now that the consortium is almost done with the presentations at the various Radiology Department, other presentations to smaller group/different audience need to be scheduled.
    • At the BWH, section heads meetings are targeted. Clare, Ron and Valerie will also present at the BIR live lunch on July.
    • Charles suggested to get on the agenda of the Department research retreat.
    • Valerie will collect the dates of the various meetings a the different institutions and work to get on their agenda.
  • Tom Ulrich, manager of communication at Catalyst Central, is working on a brochure to advertise the different consultation services. Some suggestions on where to distribute them were: add one in the orientation book of the new fellows, distribution during orientation session, meetings where we give a talk about the Catalyst etc
  • Sending an e-mail targeting younger investigators is a good idea. The group wants to send a personnel message from each instituion.
    • The group will work together o a marketing plan, Valerie will write a draft and submit it to the group. The final review will be done on June 9 during the mini-retreat and then presented to Catalyst Central.
  • The front page of the intranet of the different institution could also be a good place to advertise for our service.