Difference between revisions of "2008 IGT Project Week Dynamic control of the MRI acquisition"
From NAMIC Wiki
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Team:Nathan McDannold, Ben Schwartz, Scott Hoge | Team:Nathan McDannold, Ben Schwartz, Scott Hoge | ||
| − | Goals: Dynamic control of the MRI acquisition based on US-based signals. This would be to apply existing technologies developed for IGT | + | Goals: Dynamic control of the MRI acquisition based on US-based signals. This would be to apply existing technologies developed for IGT such as optical-based tracking of a biopsy or ablation probe. |
| + | |||
| + | Needs: | ||
| + | # want to move FUS treatments to dynamic target (liver, kidney) | ||
| + | |||
Approach: | Approach: | ||
| + | # use ultrasound navigators | ||
| + | # how many sensors does one need? | ||
| + | # different ways to manipulate the MR scan | ||
| + | |||
Results (to be completed and presented at the end of the week): | Results (to be completed and presented at the end of the week): | ||
Revision as of 19:09, 8 December 2008
Home < 2008 IGT Project Week Dynamic control of the MRI acquisitionBack to 2008_IGT_Project_Week#Projects
Team:Nathan McDannold, Ben Schwartz, Scott Hoge
Goals: Dynamic control of the MRI acquisition based on US-based signals. This would be to apply existing technologies developed for IGT such as optical-based tracking of a biopsy or ablation probe.
Needs:
- want to move FUS treatments to dynamic target (liver, kidney)
Approach:
- use ultrasound navigators
- how many sensors does one need?
- different ways to manipulate the MR scan
Results (to be completed and presented at the end of the week):
