Difference between revisions of "2008 July Slicer IGT VV Link Session II"

From NAMIC Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 33: Line 33:
 
*** should this be on a stand alone machine?
 
*** should this be on a stand alone machine?
 
*** do we make this proxy code into a project of it's own or part of igtl library
 
*** do we make this proxy code into a project of it's own or part of igtl library
*** write any test code to move the vv/igtl proxy concept along (how can we use the demo from the project week as the basis for something that
+
*** write any test code to move the vv/igtl proxy concept along (how can we use the demo from the project week as the basis for something that can be used clinically?)
can be used clinically?)
 
 
** Xenios feedback on igtl library software and use cases (he ended up using the C code and not the C++)
 
** Xenios feedback on igtl library software and use cases (he ended up using the C code and not the C++)
 
** collect practical feedback on vvlink in the OR from Yale's experience
 
** collect practical feedback on vvlink in the OR from Yale's experience
 
** get demos of Yale software and discuss interoperability options and possible funding mechanisms.
 
** get demos of Yale software and discuss interoperability options and possible funding mechanisms.

Revision as of 10:44, 17 July 2008

Home < 2008 July Slicer IGT VV Link Session II

Tentative Date: Wednesday, July 23

Location: 1249 Boylston Street, Second Floor Conference Room. (Driving directions to 1249 Boylston, Boston MA)

Hotel Information: Boston_Hotels

Participants:

  • Xenios Papademetis
  • Noby Hata
  • Haiying Liu
  • Junichi Tokuda
  • Steve Pieper

Schedule

Tuesday Afternoon:

Availability: Xenios at ~1:30pm, Steve, Haiying

Wednesday:

Availability: Steve in afternoon, All day: Xenios, Haiying

  • Continuation of Brainlab vvlink integration with Slicer
  • 2:30 journal club presentation by Xenios (at 1249)

Agenda

  • Steve suggested:
    • going through the vvlink and openigtlink protocols
      • identifying areas places where igtl can be expanded
      • finding gaps in vvlink that will need workaround (image orientation - Xenios has heuristics for this)
    • reviewing options for the vv/igtl proxy server
      • should this be on a stand alone machine?
      • do we make this proxy code into a project of it's own or part of igtl library
      • write any test code to move the vv/igtl proxy concept along (how can we use the demo from the project week as the basis for something that can be used clinically?)
    • Xenios feedback on igtl library software and use cases (he ended up using the C code and not the C++)
    • collect practical feedback on vvlink in the OR from Yale's experience
    • get demos of Yale software and discuss interoperability options and possible funding mechanisms.