Difference between revisions of "2009 Winter Project Week:LesionAlgorithms"

From NAMIC Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(New page: {| |thumb|320px|Return to [[2009_Winter_Project_Week|Project Week Main Page ]] |} __NOTOC__ ===Key Investigators=== <div style="margin: 20px;"> <div style="w...)
 
 
(4 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 8: Line 8:
  
 
===Key Investigators===
 
===Key Investigators===
 
+
Mark, Marcel, Vince, Ross, Jeremy
  
 
<div style="margin: 20px;">
 
<div style="margin: 20px;">
Line 15: Line 15:
  
 
<h1>Objective</h1>
 
<h1>Objective</h1>
 
+
We have tested several algorithms and approaches for classifying white matter lesions.<br>
 +
There are also other methods within the NA-MIC kit and and external approach that is being developed to be used within Slicer (WMLS).<br>
 +
Currently for our end to end tutorial, we have implemented a novel algorithm because the generalizability of our previous method to the clinical sample was poor.<br>
 +
We need to make a final selection on choice of algorithm and any resulting optimization strategy to be used for final analysis and a timely manuscript.
  
 
</div>
 
</div>
Line 22: Line 25:
  
 
<h1>Approach, Plan</h1>
 
<h1>Approach, Plan</h1>
 
+
Review comparisons of NA-MIC kit tools EM-Segment, Prastawa Method, Magnotta Method, a new method a UPenn, etc<br>
 +
What is the best approach to use for the roadmap project?<br>
 +
What if anything can be leveraged or combined into a universal method?<br>
 +
This work should lead towards planned MICCAI (march 8 due date) or other venue paper on white matter lesion also plan on immediately after full application/analysis of a clinical lupus sample (n=62).<br>
 
</div>
 
</div>
  
Line 28: Line 34:
  
 
<h1>Progress</h1>
 
<h1>Progress</h1>
 
 
 
</div>
 
</div>
 +
* We have prepared an HBM abstract for submission on Sunday, 01/11/09
 +
* Scoped out a manuscript submission to MICCAI for March 8th.
 +
* In a parallel effort we'll be doing a comparison of lesion classification methods for neuroimage submission with Marcel, Vince Magnotta, and other intersted parties for future submission at a conference to be determined.
  
 
<br style="clear: both;" />
 
<br style="clear: both;" />

Latest revision as of 16:35, 9 January 2009

Home < 2009 Winter Project Week:LesionAlgorithms



Key Investigators

Mark, Marcel, Vince, Ross, Jeremy

Objective

We have tested several algorithms and approaches for classifying white matter lesions.
There are also other methods within the NA-MIC kit and and external approach that is being developed to be used within Slicer (WMLS).
Currently for our end to end tutorial, we have implemented a novel algorithm because the generalizability of our previous method to the clinical sample was poor.
We need to make a final selection on choice of algorithm and any resulting optimization strategy to be used for final analysis and a timely manuscript.

Approach, Plan

Review comparisons of NA-MIC kit tools EM-Segment, Prastawa Method, Magnotta Method, a new method a UPenn, etc
What is the best approach to use for the roadmap project?
What if anything can be leveraged or combined into a universal method?
This work should lead towards planned MICCAI (march 8 due date) or other venue paper on white matter lesion also plan on immediately after full application/analysis of a clinical lupus sample (n=62).

Progress

  • We have prepared an HBM abstract for submission on Sunday, 01/11/09
  • Scoped out a manuscript submission to MICCAI for March 8th.
  • In a parallel effort we'll be doing a comparison of lesion classification methods for neuroimage submission with Marcel, Vince Magnotta, and other intersted parties for future submission at a conference to be determined.


References