Difference between revisions of "2009 Winter Project Week:LesionAlgorithms"
Hjbockholt (talk | contribs) |
|||
| (3 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
===Key Investigators=== | ===Key Investigators=== | ||
| − | Marcel, Vince, Ross, Jeremy | + | Mark, Marcel, Vince, Ross, Jeremy |
<div style="margin: 20px;"> | <div style="margin: 20px;"> | ||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
<h1>Objective</h1> | <h1>Objective</h1> | ||
| − | We have tested several algorithms and approaches for classifying white matter lesions. | + | We have tested several algorithms and approaches for classifying white matter lesions.<br> |
| − | + | There are also other methods within the NA-MIC kit and and external approach that is being developed to be used within Slicer (WMLS).<br> | |
| − | + | Currently for our end to end tutorial, we have implemented a novel algorithm because the generalizability of our previous method to the clinical sample was poor.<br> | |
| + | We need to make a final selection on choice of algorithm and any resulting optimization strategy to be used for final analysis and a timely manuscript. | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
| Line 24: | Line 25: | ||
<h1>Approach, Plan</h1> | <h1>Approach, Plan</h1> | ||
| − | Review comparisons of NA-MIC kit tools EM-Segment, Prastawa Method, Magnotta Method, etc | + | Review comparisons of NA-MIC kit tools EM-Segment, Prastawa Method, Magnotta Method, a new method a UPenn, etc<br> |
| − | + | What is the best approach to use for the roadmap project?<br> | |
| − | + | What if anything can be leveraged or combined into a universal method?<br> | |
| + | This work should lead towards planned MICCAI (march 8 due date) or other venue paper on white matter lesion also plan on immediately after full application/analysis of a clinical lupus sample (n=62).<br> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
| Line 32: | Line 34: | ||
<h1>Progress</h1> | <h1>Progress</h1> | ||
| − | |||
</div> | </div> | ||
| + | * We have prepared an HBM abstract for submission on Sunday, 01/11/09 | ||
| + | * Scoped out a manuscript submission to MICCAI for March 8th. | ||
| + | * In a parallel effort we'll be doing a comparison of lesion classification methods for neuroimage submission with Marcel, Vince Magnotta, and other intersted parties for future submission at a conference to be determined. | ||
<br style="clear: both;" /> | <br style="clear: both;" /> | ||
Latest revision as of 16:35, 9 January 2009
Home < 2009 Winter Project Week:LesionAlgorithms Return to Project Week Main Page |
Key Investigators
Mark, Marcel, Vince, Ross, Jeremy
Objective
We have tested several algorithms and approaches for classifying white matter lesions.
There are also other methods within the NA-MIC kit and and external approach that is being developed to be used within Slicer (WMLS).
Currently for our end to end tutorial, we have implemented a novel algorithm because the generalizability of our previous method to the clinical sample was poor.
We need to make a final selection on choice of algorithm and any resulting optimization strategy to be used for final analysis and a timely manuscript.
Approach, Plan
Review comparisons of NA-MIC kit tools EM-Segment, Prastawa Method, Magnotta Method, a new method a UPenn, etc
What is the best approach to use for the roadmap project?
What if anything can be leveraged or combined into a universal method?
This work should lead towards planned MICCAI (march 8 due date) or other venue paper on white matter lesion also plan on immediately after full application/analysis of a clinical lupus sample (n=62).
Progress
- We have prepared an HBM abstract for submission on Sunday, 01/11/09
- Scoped out a manuscript submission to MICCAI for March 8th.
- In a parallel effort we'll be doing a comparison of lesion classification methods for neuroimage submission with Marcel, Vince Magnotta, and other intersted parties for future submission at a conference to be determined.
