Difference between revisions of "2011 Winter Project Week:Breakout Pathology and Longitudinal Followup"

From NAMIC Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
 
(7 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
   Back to [[AHM 2011#Agenda| Project Week Agenda]]
 
   Back to [[AHM 2011#Agenda| Project Week Agenda]]
  
'''Session Leaders:Guido Gerig'''
+
'''Session Leader:Guido Gerig'''
  
 
Informal discussion on development and implementation of:
 
Informal discussion on development and implementation of:
a) methods towards segmentation and visualization of pathology
+
*a) methods towards segmentation and visualization of pathology
b) methodology required to assess follow-up data with and without pathology
+
*b) methodology required to assess follow-up data with and without pathology
  
 
The session was mainly motivated by questions in regard to the UCLA DBP project on TBI, but the discussion might be relevant to all other clinical subject-specific analysis involving pathology and/or serial or longitudinal data.
 
The session was mainly motivated by questions in regard to the UCLA DBP project on TBI, but the discussion might be relevant to all other clinical subject-specific analysis involving pathology and/or serial or longitudinal data.
  
Participants:
+
== Participants ==
  
Guido Gerig, Utah
+
*Guido Gerig, Utah
Stephen Aylward, Kitware
+
*Stephen Aylward, Kitware
Marcel Prastawa, Utah
+
*Marcel Prastawa, Utah
Martin Styner, UNC
+
*Clement Vachet, UNC
Micah Chambers, UCLA
+
*Micah Chambers, UCLA
Andrei Irmia, UCLA
+
*Andrei Irmia, UCLA
Bo Wang, Utah
+
*Bo Wang, Utah
Anuja Sharma, Utah
+
*Anuja Sharma, Utah
also invited: John Van Horn, UCLA
+
*Hans Johnson, Iowa
 
+
*Mark Scully, Iowa
etc., everyone interested in this topic is welcome to attend
+
*Joy Matsui, Iowa
 +
*Xiaodong Tao, GE Research
 +
*
 +
*plus 10 other NAMIC researchers interested in these topics

Latest revision as of 22:27, 11 January 2011

Home < 2011 Winter Project Week:Breakout Pathology and Longitudinal Followup
 Back to  Project Week Agenda

Session Leader:Guido Gerig

Informal discussion on development and implementation of:

  • a) methods towards segmentation and visualization of pathology
  • b) methodology required to assess follow-up data with and without pathology

The session was mainly motivated by questions in regard to the UCLA DBP project on TBI, but the discussion might be relevant to all other clinical subject-specific analysis involving pathology and/or serial or longitudinal data.

Participants

  • Guido Gerig, Utah
  • Stephen Aylward, Kitware
  • Marcel Prastawa, Utah
  • Clement Vachet, UNC
  • Micah Chambers, UCLA
  • Andrei Irmia, UCLA
  • Bo Wang, Utah
  • Anuja Sharma, Utah
  • Hans Johnson, Iowa
  • Mark Scully, Iowa
  • Joy Matsui, Iowa
  • Xiaodong Tao, GE Research
  • plus 10 other NAMIC researchers interested in these topics