Difference between revisions of "2011 Winter Project Week:Breakout Pathology and Longitudinal Followup"
From NAMIC Wiki
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Informal discussion on development and implementation of: | Informal discussion on development and implementation of: | ||
| − | a) methods towards segmentation and visualization of pathology | + | *a) methods towards segmentation and visualization of pathology |
| − | b) methodology required to assess follow-up data with and without pathology | + | *b) methodology required to assess follow-up data with and without pathology |
The session was mainly motivated by questions in regard to the UCLA DBP project on TBI, but the discussion might be relevant to all other clinical subject-specific analysis involving pathology and/or serial or longitudinal data. | The session was mainly motivated by questions in regard to the UCLA DBP project on TBI, but the discussion might be relevant to all other clinical subject-specific analysis involving pathology and/or serial or longitudinal data. | ||
| − | Participants | + | == Participants == |
| − | Guido Gerig, Utah | + | *Guido Gerig, Utah |
| − | Stephen Aylward, Kitware | + | *Stephen Aylward, Kitware |
| − | Marcel Prastawa, Utah | + | *Marcel Prastawa, Utah |
| − | Martin Styner, UNC | + | *Martin Styner, UNC |
| − | Micah Chambers, UCLA | + | *Micah Chambers, UCLA |
| − | Andrei Irmia, UCLA | + | *Andrei Irmia, UCLA |
| − | Bo Wang, Utah | + | *Bo Wang, Utah |
| − | Anuja Sharma, Utah | + | *Anuja Sharma, Utah |
| − | also invited: John Van Horn, UCLA | + | *also invited: John Van Horn, UCLA |
| − | + | *etc., everyone interested in this topic is welcome to attend | |
| − | etc., everyone interested in this topic is welcome to attend | ||
Revision as of 18:53, 11 January 2011
Home < 2011 Winter Project Week:Breakout Pathology and Longitudinal FollowupBack to Project Week Agenda
Session Leaders:Guido Gerig
Informal discussion on development and implementation of:
- a) methods towards segmentation and visualization of pathology
- b) methodology required to assess follow-up data with and without pathology
The session was mainly motivated by questions in regard to the UCLA DBP project on TBI, but the discussion might be relevant to all other clinical subject-specific analysis involving pathology and/or serial or longitudinal data.
Participants
- Guido Gerig, Utah
- Stephen Aylward, Kitware
- Marcel Prastawa, Utah
- Martin Styner, UNC
- Micah Chambers, UCLA
- Andrei Irmia, UCLA
- Bo Wang, Utah
- Anuja Sharma, Utah
- also invited: John Van Horn, UCLA
- etc., everyone interested in this topic is welcome to attend
