Difference between revisions of "2011 Winter Project Week:Breakout Pathology and Longitudinal Followup"
From NAMIC Wiki
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
The session was mainly motivated by questions in regard to the UCLA DBP project on TBI, but the discussion might be relevant to all other clinical subject-specific analysis involving pathology and/or serial or longitudinal data. | The session was mainly motivated by questions in regard to the UCLA DBP project on TBI, but the discussion might be relevant to all other clinical subject-specific analysis involving pathology and/or serial or longitudinal data. | ||
| − | == | + | == Participants == |
*Guido Gerig, Utah | *Guido Gerig, Utah | ||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
*Xiaodong Tao, GE Research | *Xiaodong Tao, GE Research | ||
* | * | ||
| − | * | + | *plus 10 other NAMIC researchers interested in these topics |
Latest revision as of 22:27, 11 January 2011
Home < 2011 Winter Project Week:Breakout Pathology and Longitudinal FollowupBack to Project Week Agenda
Session Leader:Guido Gerig
Informal discussion on development and implementation of:
- a) methods towards segmentation and visualization of pathology
- b) methodology required to assess follow-up data with and without pathology
The session was mainly motivated by questions in regard to the UCLA DBP project on TBI, but the discussion might be relevant to all other clinical subject-specific analysis involving pathology and/or serial or longitudinal data.
Participants
- Guido Gerig, Utah
- Stephen Aylward, Kitware
- Marcel Prastawa, Utah
- Clement Vachet, UNC
- Micah Chambers, UCLA
- Andrei Irmia, UCLA
- Bo Wang, Utah
- Anuja Sharma, Utah
- Hans Johnson, Iowa
- Mark Scully, Iowa
- Joy Matsui, Iowa
- Xiaodong Tao, GE Research
- plus 10 other NAMIC researchers interested in these topics
