Difference between revisions of "2013 Summer Project Week:Deformable registration validation toolkit"

From NAMIC Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
 
<gallery>
 
<gallery>
 
Image:PW-MIT2013.png|[[2013_Summer_Project_Week#Projects|Projects List]]
 
Image:PW-MIT2013.png|[[2013_Summer_Project_Week#Projects|Projects List]]
 +
Image:2013_Summer_Project_Week_Registration_Validation_1.jpg|SIFT features
 +
Image:2013_Summer_Project_Week_Registration_Validation-VisAIRe.gif|VisAIRe registration validation extension in Slicer
 
</gallery>
 
</gallery>
  
 
==Key Investigators==
 
==Key Investigators==
 
* MGH: Greg Sharp
 
* MGH: Greg Sharp
 +
* PMH, Toronto: Kevin Wang
 +
* BWH: Andrey Fedorov
  
 
<div style="margin: 20px;">
 
<div style="margin: 20px;">
Line 18: Line 22:
  
 
<h3>Approach, Plan</h3>
 
<h3>Approach, Plan</h3>
Write plan here.
+
* Review Andrey Fedorov's qualitative registration review
 +
* Review Chiara Paganelli's feature matching method
 +
* Review Matthew Toews' feature matching method
  
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
 
<div style="width: 40%; float: left;">
 
<div style="width: 40%; float: left;">
  
 
<h3>Progress</h3>
 
<h3>Progress</h3>
 +
* Qualitative review method is very nice, but doesn't offer quantitative method.  This method should be very useful for QA of many scans
 +
* Quantitative method is required for algorithm tuning
 +
* Paganelli's method only returned a small-ish number of features.  Work is continuing to improve this.
 +
* Toews' method returns many features, but in voxel coordinates, so cannot yet be reviewed.
  
 
</div>
 
</div>

Latest revision as of 03:14, 21 June 2013

Home < 2013 Summer Project Week:Deformable registration validation toolkit

Key Investigators

  • MGH: Greg Sharp
  • PMH, Toronto: Kevin Wang
  • BWH: Andrey Fedorov

Objective

We are developing tools for helping users assess the accuracy of deformable image registration.

Approach, Plan

  • Review Andrey Fedorov's qualitative registration review
  • Review Chiara Paganelli's feature matching method
  • Review Matthew Toews' feature matching method

Progress

  • Qualitative review method is very nice, but doesn't offer quantitative method. This method should be very useful for QA of many scans
  • Quantitative method is required for algorithm tuning
  • Paganelli's method only returned a small-ish number of features. Work is continuing to improve this.
  • Toews' method returns many features, but in voxel coordinates, so cannot yet be reviewed.

Delivery Mechanism

This work will be delivered to the NA-MIC Kit as:

  • Extension -- python scripted

References