Difference between revisions of "BSpline Registration in Slicer3"

From NAMIC Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 10: Line 10:
  
 
<div style="margin: 20px;">
 
<div style="margin: 20px;">
 +
 
<div style="width: 27%; float: left; padding-right: 3%;">
 
<div style="width: 27%; float: left; padding-right: 3%;">
 
 
<h3>Objective</h3>
 
<h3>Objective</h3>
 
BSpline image registration module for Slicer3
 
BSpline image registration module for Slicer3
 +
</div>
  
 +
<div style="width: 40%; float: left;">
 +
<h3>Progress</h3>
 +
* Standalone Bspline registration is working.
 +
* Registration in physical coordinates
 +
* Identified a set of test cases
 
</div>
 
</div>
  
 
<div style="width: 27%; float: left; padding-right: 3%;">
 
<div style="width: 27%; float: left; padding-right: 3%;">
 
+
<h3>Further task</h3>
<h3>Approach, Plan</h3>
+
* Smarter regularization - Less user interaction
* Adapt Bspline code to work ITK
+
* Compare to elastic registration.
* Do all registration in physical (world) space
+
* Simple registration module - either bspline or elastic
*Integrate in existing slicer Bspline registration module
 
 
 
 
</div>
 
</div>
  
<div style="width: 40%; float: left;">
 
 
<h3>Progress</h3>
 
Standalone Bspline registration is working.
 
 
</div>
 
 
</div>
 
</div>
  

Latest revision as of 02:08, 26 June 2009

Home < BSpline Registration in Slicer3


Key Investigators

  • GE: Jim Miller
  • Utah: Ross Whitaker, Samuel Gerber

Objective

BSpline image registration module for Slicer3

Progress

  • Standalone Bspline registration is working.
  • Registration in physical coordinates
  • Identified a set of test cases

Further task

  • Smarter regularization - Less user interaction
  • Compare to elastic registration.
  • Simple registration module - either bspline or elastic

References