Difference between revisions of "CTSC:TTIC.031610"

From NAMIC Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with ''''Agenda''' # Consultations: update on on-going consultations # Education program # Harvard Catalyst retreat (feedback from Randy)')
 
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
Back to [[Collaboration:Harvard_CTSC|Collaboration:Harvard_CTSC]]
 +
<br>
 +
 
'''Agenda'''
 
'''Agenda'''
  
Line 4: Line 7:
 
# Education program
 
# Education program
 
# Harvard Catalyst retreat (feedback from Randy)
 
# Harvard Catalyst retreat (feedback from Randy)
 +
 +
== Harvard Translational Imaging Consortium Meeting Minutes March 16, 2010 ==
 +
 +
In attendance:
 +
 +
* Valerie Humblet
 +
* Randy Gollub
 +
* Laura Alice
 +
* Wendy Plesniak
 +
* Gordon Harris
 +
* Charles Guttmann
 +
* Bill Hanlon
 +
* Clare Tempany
 +
* Bob Lenkinsky
 +
* Simon Warfield
 +
* Gordon Williams
 +
* Neil Rofsky
 +
 +
<br>
 +
 +
'''1. Consultations''' <br>
 +
 +
* All the consultations have been assigned, all updated in JIRA.
 +
 +
<br>
 +
 +
'''2. Education program''' <br>
 +
 +
* Neuroimaging:
 +
** Randy updated the speaker list.
 +
** As for the other sessions, the talks will target people interested more in the discipline than the physics of the technique.
 +
* General:
 +
** Important to highlight health protected data in the life cycle of medical imaging talks.
 +
** The talks can be uploaded on the SPL secure website, Valerie will communicate the url and the username and password.
 +
 +
<br>
 +
 +
'''3. Harvard Catalyst retreat'''
 +
 +
* Translational PIs are the main target of Harvard Catalyst.
 +
* During the retreat, participant were asked to view Harvard Catalyst from the point of view of the PIs, the division chiefs, the CEO, the President etc.
 +
* People do not believe that Harvard Catalyst reaches a broad enough group, very often people don't know about the resources.
 +
* Any program that has money attached to it (KL2, pilot grant, PCIR lab support) gets a better impact.
 +
** This means that having a budget to pay for scan would be a very good thing because so far we advertise the resources but we don't have the budget to let PIs used them.
 +
** Bob suggested to be more pro-active and pick a couple of projects that are multi-institutional, support them and then show our accomplishment. Bob agreed to lead a subcommittee that would meet offline and then report to the group.

Latest revision as of 02:04, 23 March 2010

Home < CTSC:TTIC.031610

Back to Collaboration:Harvard_CTSC

Agenda

  1. Consultations: update on on-going consultations
  2. Education program
  3. Harvard Catalyst retreat (feedback from Randy)

Harvard Translational Imaging Consortium Meeting Minutes March 16, 2010

In attendance:

  • Valerie Humblet
  • Randy Gollub
  • Laura Alice
  • Wendy Plesniak
  • Gordon Harris
  • Charles Guttmann
  • Bill Hanlon
  • Clare Tempany
  • Bob Lenkinsky
  • Simon Warfield
  • Gordon Williams
  • Neil Rofsky


1. Consultations

  • All the consultations have been assigned, all updated in JIRA.


2. Education program

  • Neuroimaging:
    • Randy updated the speaker list.
    • As for the other sessions, the talks will target people interested more in the discipline than the physics of the technique.
  • General:
    • Important to highlight health protected data in the life cycle of medical imaging talks.
    • The talks can be uploaded on the SPL secure website, Valerie will communicate the url and the username and password.


3. Harvard Catalyst retreat

  • Translational PIs are the main target of Harvard Catalyst.
  • During the retreat, participant were asked to view Harvard Catalyst from the point of view of the PIs, the division chiefs, the CEO, the President etc.
  • People do not believe that Harvard Catalyst reaches a broad enough group, very often people don't know about the resources.
  • Any program that has money attached to it (KL2, pilot grant, PCIR lab support) gets a better impact.
    • This means that having a budget to pay for scan would be a very good thing because so far we advertise the resources but we don't have the budget to let PIs used them.
    • Bob suggested to be more pro-active and pick a couple of projects that are multi-institutional, support them and then show our accomplishment. Bob agreed to lead a subcommittee that would meet offline and then report to the group.