Difference between revisions of "Events:Computational Methods for Radiation Oncology"

From NAMIC Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 45: Line 45:
 
**Summary: what we do next?
 
**Summary: what we do next?
  
==Confirmed Participants==
+
==Participants==
  
 
#Julian Rosenman
 
#Julian Rosenman
Line 57: Line 57:
 
#Ron Alterovitz
 
#Ron Alterovitz
 
#Ron Kikinis
 
#Ron Kikinis
 +
#Clare Tempany
 +
#Ferenc Jolesz
 
#Sandy Wells
 
#Sandy Wells
 
#Steve Pieper
 
#Steve Pieper
Line 72: Line 74:
 
#Andinet Enquobahrie
 
#Andinet Enquobahrie
 
#Firdaus Janoos
 
#Firdaus Janoos
 
  
 
==Potential Areas of Collaboration==
 
==Potential Areas of Collaboration==

Revision as of 15:37, 6 May 2011

Home < Events:Computational Methods for Radiation Oncology
 Back to Events

Date and Location

Date: Thursday, May 5, 2011

Location: Surgery Education Office, Room CA-034, Carrie Hall, 15 Francis Street. (Directions)

In addition, the following information is useful for first time visitors to the hospital:

Agenda

To brainstorm computational methods for radiation oncology between UNC, NA-MIC, BWH.


  • 8am: Breakfast
  • 8:30-10:30am: UNC -presentations about capabilities of current projects, short term and longer term plans
    • Julian Rosenman PLUNC 18 minutes
    • Gregg Tracton Software for PLUNC, segmentation, registration 10 minutes
    • Stephen Pizer Registration by regression (2 methods), Segmentation via posterior optimization, training probability distributions on s reps and quantile functions, segmentation via correspondence-preserving warps, ant aliasing 23 minutes
    • Sha Chang Nanotube imaging, incl. for IGRT 10 minutes
    • Brandon Frederick Iterative tomographic reconstruction, CTs at treatment time, gpu’s 15 minutes
    • Derek Merck 3D visualization via model-guided rendering, 3D visualization in PLUNC for RTP 15 minutes
    • Ilknur Kabul Texturing of surfaces, onion skins, and cut planes; interpolation of textures 10 minutes
    • Hina Shah Registration of endoscopic cine and CT of throat,fused displays of these two registered sources 8 minutes
    • Ron Alterovitz Planning for brachytherapy with curved needles, FEM software 12 minutes
  • 10:30 am: Break
  • 11:50am-2:30pm NA-MIC/Harvard presentations about capabilities of current projects, short term and longer term plans
    • AMIGO (Tina Kapur) (5 minutes)
    • Slicer3 to Slicer 4, Radiation Therapy support today, and plans for the next year (slides) (Steve Pieper) (30 minutes)
    • SPARKit, Canadian grant for providing open source software platform for radiotherapy, potentially based on NA-MIC Kit (slides) (Andras Lasso) (10minutes)
    • Head and Neck Cancer NA-MIC DBP (slides) (Greg Sharp) (15 minutes)
    • Gynecologic Cancer Brachytherapy Plans (Tina Kapur) (10 minutes)
    • Shadie, shading language for volume visualization (slides) (Hanspeter Pfister, Milos Hasan, George Chen, John Wolfgang) (20 minutes)
  • Continue presentations...
  • 2:30pm: Intro of afternoon objectives (Julian Rosenman)
  • 2:45pm: What UNC/Boston system combinations ought to be developed -- the Boston perspective (Tina Kapur)
  • 3pm: What Boston/UNC system combinations ought to be developed -- the UNC perspective (Steve Pizer)
  • 3:30pm: Comments from Kitware about their capabilities relevant to proposed combinations (Brad Davis)
  • 4-5pm
    • Break and subgroup formation (e.g., merging surgical and radiation treatment planning system; 3D visualization software for treatment planning; image analysis software for treatment planning)
    • Subgroups sketch out mechanics for collaborations (http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/pa-files/PAR-11-028.html?)
    • Summary: what we do next?

Participants

  1. Julian Rosenman
  2. Gregg Tracton
  3. Stephen Pizer
  4. Sha Chang
  5. Brandon Frederick
  6. Derek Merck
  7. Ilknur Kabul
  8. Hina Shah
  9. Ron Alterovitz
  10. Ron Kikinis
  11. Clare Tempany
  12. Ferenc Jolesz
  13. Sandy Wells
  14. Steve Pieper
  15. Andras Lasso
  16. Greg Sharp
  17. Tina Kapur
  18. Hanspeter Pfister
  19. Milos Hasan
  20. George Chen
  21. John Wolfgang
  22. Petter Risholm
  23. Andrey Fedorov
  24. James Balter
  25. Brad Davis
  26. Andinet Enquobahrie
  27. Firdaus Janoos

Potential Areas of Collaboration

  1. Multimodal registrations from BWH with PLUNC
  2. ITK needs GPU codes
  3. How to put UNC code into the open source world (from BWH experience)
  4. Visual bookmarks as cf. Slicer (scene views)
  5. Tolerance and other surface color washes on textured objects
  6. Endoscopy and 3D MR segmentation: cervix
  7. AMIGO w/ endoscopy
  8. AMIGO w/ curved needles
  9. Curved needles for biopsies
  10. Optical CT inclusion
  11. FEM modeling sharings between BWH and UNC
  12. Robotics and device tracking sharing: BWH has device tracking expertise: OPENIGT
  13. Shadie/MGRView or 3D PLUNC or 3D Slicer integration
  14. Adding cmake/software process to PLUNC
  15. Problem: how to integrate object-based coordinate systems into object models and integrate UI controls within those coordinate systems?
  16. MGRView w/ ray-cast volume rendering a la volview/vtk
  17. Inclusion of Ontario ARKit/SparKit? (adaptive RT)
  18. What can be taken from PLUNC into Slicer right away?
  19. There needs to be a remodeling of PLUNC licensing to meet the Slicer sharing philosophy
  20. US-to-MR or -CT registration brought to RT
  21. Visualize uncertainty by painting over texture (Pfister/UNC)
  22. Combine Shadie language with MGRView/PLUNC 3Dview capabilities
  23. Image analysis and visualization via Slicer (selected modules in use) into PLUNC into MOSAIQ, etc.
  24. PLUNC Need: Flexibility/refactor?. Multimodal registration. Including context; annotations
  25. Is there a role for python, numpy?
  26. Note: WashU CERR has a simple dose engine. Do we integrate that?
  27. 2d-3d Registration for IGRT using Nanotube Stationary Tomosynthesis from Siemens, Xinray
  28. Head and Neck Segmentation by registration and refinement
  29. Antialiasing algorithm
    1. How will antialiasing impact DVHs? What is the drift in the dose distribution
    2. Morphomics Segmentation software for Prostate and Cervix maybe
  30. James balter collaboration LA problem
  31. ITK should have GPU support
  32. Potential tools from UNC:
    1. Antialiasing software (potential project week project -- steve pizer, brad davis, petter risholm, andriy fedorov)
    2. Iterative reconstruction software is shareable
    3. General GPU tools
    4. Manual Editing of alignment
    5. Dose accumulation calculation
  33. Mechanisms
    1. Software maintenance R01
    2. BRP collaborative grant
  34. Registration of endoscopic images with CT for IGRT: Gyn colposcopy
  35. Steerable needle planning for gyne brachytherapy
  36. How to close the loop with feedback for needle insertion and steering for prostate brachy?
  37. Open FEM standard for RT
  38. Slicer License for UNC review: http://www.slicer.org/pages/LicenseText
  39. http://wiki.na-mic.org/Wiki/index.php/2011_Summer_Project_Week