Difference between revisions of "2010 Winter Project Week Musco Skeletal Segmentation"

From NAMIC Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
 
(7 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 15: Line 15:
 
==Key Investigators==
 
==Key Investigators==
 
* Stanford: Harish Doddi, Saikat Pal, Scott Delp
 
* Stanford: Harish Doddi, Saikat Pal, Scott Delp
−
* Kitware: Luis Ibanez
+
* Kitware: Luis Ibanez, Harvey Cline
 +
* GE Research: Xiaodong Tao
  
 
<div style="margin: 20px;">
 
<div style="margin: 20px;">
Line 26: Line 27:
 
<BR>
 
<BR>
 
2. Generation of simulation-ready models from existing atlas and label maps of individual structures.
 
2. Generation of simulation-ready models from existing atlas and label maps of individual structures.
−
 
−
 
 
</div>
 
</div>
  
Line 35: Line 34:
 
<i><u>Approach:</u></i>
 
<i><u>Approach:</u></i>
 
<BR>
 
<BR>
−
Objective 1: We have adopted a multi-contrast MR methodology to segment knee bones and cartilage structures.  The algorithm utilizes tissue intensity information from multiple MR contrasts to segment structures of interest.  Inputs to the algorithm included n registered MR image sets.  The algorithm created an n-dimensional space of voxel intensities associated with the n image sets. The user assigned seed points to the structures of interest, and the algorithm assigned a cluster center to each structure of interest.   
+
Objective 1: We have adopted a multi-contrast MR methodology to segment knee bones and cartilage structures.  The algorithm utilizes tissue intensity information from multiple MR contrasts to segment structures of interest.  Inputs to the algorithm included n registered MR image sets.  The algorithm created an n-dimensional space of voxel intensities associated with the n image sets. The user assigned seed points to the structures of interest, and the algorithm created a cluster center for each structure of interest. Cluster radii were calculated based on standard deviations obtained from seed points, and tissue structures were classified as label maps.  
−
 
 
−
 
 
−
Multi-Contrast MR images are collected and seed points for each region of interest are taken as input. Cluster center and standard deviation are calculated for each ROI based on pixel intensities of the seed points. The pixels are clustered based on different pixel intensity values in multiple MR images to the nearest cluster center radius.
 
  
−
For detailed approach, please visit http://www.na-mic.org/Wiki/index.php/Stanford_Simbios_group
+
For more details, please visit http://www.na-mic.org/Wiki/index.php/Stanford_Simbios_group
−
<BR>
 
−
<BR>
 
 
<BR>
 
<BR>
 
<i><u>Plan: </u></i>
 
<i><u>Plan: </u></i>
 
<BR>
 
<BR>
−
a. Smooth the existing segmented label maps  
+
a. Incorporate a method to refine label maps (remove undesired bridge connections). 
 
<BR>
 
<BR>
−
b. Build models for bones and cartilage from the existing segmented label maps.  
+
b. Implement an algorithm to assign fiducial points to region boundaries for manual adjustments of geometries.  
  
 
</div>
 
</div>
Line 55: Line 49:
  
 
<h3>Progress</h3>
 
<h3>Progress</h3>
−
Finished segmenting different regions of interest like bones, cartilage etc.
+
* Implemented algorithm to segment structures of interest from multi-constrast MR images.
 +
* Generated label maps of knee and hip structures. 
 +
* Implemented a pipeline to rapidly refine label maps to isolate regions of interest. 
 +
* Identified an approach to trace geometry boundary and automatically assign fiducial points.  
  
−
Created label maps from existing segmented output.
 
  
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
</div>

Latest revision as of 16:28, 7 January 2010

Home < 2010 Winter Project Week Musco Skeletal Segmentation

  • Ideal Spgr Fat MR image

  • Ideal Spgr Water MR image

  • Segmentation Output

  • Bones

  • Cartilage

  • SpgrWater_Hip

  • SpgrFat_Hip

  • Hip Output


Key Investigators

  • Stanford: Harish Doddi, Saikat Pal, Scott Delp
  • Kitware: Luis Ibanez, Harvey Cline
  • GE Research: Xiaodong Tao

Objective

The aim of this project is to develop a methodology for rapid segmentation of knee structures from magnetic resonance (MR) images for subject-specific modeling. The overall goal can be broken down into two specific objectives -
1. Rapid segmentation of target structures into label maps.
2. Generation of simulation-ready models from existing atlas and label maps of individual structures.

Approach, Plan

Approach:
Objective 1: We have adopted a multi-contrast MR methodology to segment knee bones and cartilage structures. The algorithm utilizes tissue intensity information from multiple MR contrasts to segment structures of interest. Inputs to the algorithm included n registered MR image sets. The algorithm created an n-dimensional space of voxel intensities associated with the n image sets. The user assigned seed points to the structures of interest, and the algorithm created a cluster center for each structure of interest. Cluster radii were calculated based on standard deviations obtained from seed points, and tissue structures were classified as label maps.

For more details, please visit http://www.na-mic.org/Wiki/index.php/Stanford_Simbios_group
Plan:
a. Incorporate a method to refine label maps (remove undesired bridge connections).
b. Implement an algorithm to assign fiducial points to region boundaries for manual adjustments of geometries.

Progress

  • Implemented algorithm to segment structures of interest from multi-constrast MR images.
  • Generated label maps of knee and hip structures.
  • Implemented a pipeline to rapidly refine label maps to isolate regions of interest.
  • Identified an approach to trace geometry boundary and automatically assign fiducial points.


Retrieved from "https://www.na-mic.org/w/index.php?title=2010_Winter_Project_Week_Musco_Skeletal_Segmentation&oldid=47390"