Difference between revisions of "2015 Winter Project Week: Multiframe DICOM"
From NAMIC Wiki
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
** Diffusion Profiles | ** Diffusion Profiles | ||
** Parametric Maps | ** Parametric Maps | ||
| + | ** Ultrasound Objects | ||
** Derived Objects | ** Derived Objects | ||
* Review the options for a dcm2dcm tool | * Review the options for a dcm2dcm tool | ||
| Line 31: | Line 32: | ||
* | * | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
| + | <h3>References</h3> | ||
| + | * There are several bugs related to improper handling of "21st Century DICOM" objects using [http://www.na-mic.org/Bug/view.php?id=3930 legacy code designed for older objects]. | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Revision as of 14:59, 30 December 2014
Home < 2015 Winter Project Week: Multiframe DICOM
Key Investigators
- Steve Pieper, Isomics
- Andrey Fedorov, BWH
- Michael Onken, Open Connections / DCMTK
Project Description
Objective
- Review progress on DICOM Enhanced Multiframe Object support in DCMTK
- Segmentation Objects (see Iowa2DICOM)
- Diffusion Profiles
- Parametric Maps
- Ultrasound Objects
- Derived Objects
- Review the options for a dcm2dcm tool
- Convert legacy acquisitions to multiframe objects
- Correctly encode derived objects
Approach, Plan
- Try to build Slicer with latest DCMTK that includes Multiframe Object support
- Try simple programs to exercise API
Progress
References
- There are several bugs related to improper handling of "21st Century DICOM" objects using legacy code designed for older objects.
